<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wise Guys: What&#8217;s the Deal with Chivalry?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emandlo.com/2009/06/wise-guys-whats-the-deal-with-chivalry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emandlo.com/2009/06/wise-guys-whats-the-deal-with-chivalry/</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of advice, news, and stories about sex, love, and other important stuff. No yoga mat required.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:49:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.emandlo.com/2009/06/wise-guys-whats-the-deal-with-chivalry/comment-page-1/#comment-4334</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emandlo.com/?p=3624#comment-4334</guid>
		<description>Men have always been known for their chivalry. If they are treated well by women, they get treated better in return. If women want to be taken good care of by their men, they need to respect and treat their men with dignity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Men have always been known for their chivalry. If they are treated well by women, they get treated better in return. If women want to be taken good care of by their men, they need to respect and treat their men with dignity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puf</title>
		<link>http://www.emandlo.com/2009/06/wise-guys-whats-the-deal-with-chivalry/comment-page-1/#comment-3591</link>
		<dc:creator>Puf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emandlo.com/?p=3624#comment-3591</guid>
		<description>Thank you Chris. Your whole post is spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Chris. Your whole post is spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady Tarrant</title>
		<link>http://www.emandlo.com/2009/06/wise-guys-whats-the-deal-with-chivalry/comment-page-1/#comment-2928</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady Tarrant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emandlo.com/?p=3624#comment-2928</guid>
		<description>Holy shit! Thank you Nadine B.! You put it so well. I especially appreciate the last part. 

Chivalry (in a gender role sense) is not supposed to be about doing things because a man feels a woman can&#039;t, it&#039;s about treating her as a lady. That means being sensitive to her needs and desires, even if her desire is to open her own door or to pay the bill, or if she needs someone to open that damn pickle jar. And in return she is to act like a gracious lady and give acknowledgment and appreciation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy shit! Thank you Nadine B.! You put it so well. I especially appreciate the last part. </p>
<p>Chivalry (in a gender role sense) is not supposed to be about doing things because a man feels a woman can&#8217;t, it&#8217;s about treating her as a lady. That means being sensitive to her needs and desires, even if her desire is to open her own door or to pay the bill, or if she needs someone to open that damn pickle jar. And in return she is to act like a gracious lady and give acknowledgment and appreciation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadine B.</title>
		<link>http://www.emandlo.com/2009/06/wise-guys-whats-the-deal-with-chivalry/comment-page-1/#comment-2922</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadine B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 22:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emandlo.com/?p=3624#comment-2922</guid>
		<description>Chivalry is most welcome; please let it come back into fashion. Even if it seems a bit silly to wait around for him to be impractical (like exiting a car), I kind of like seeing his effort. His chivalrous gestures scream &quot;I was not raised by wolves! Please consider me!&quot; It makes me think he&#039;s looking for a lady, rather than a lay. 

Taking away a suitor&#039;s chance to wear the pants is lame. Let him show you his goods. Let him strut. If things keep going well, you&#039;re going to want to know he knows how to be a man, beyond cosmetic manners. If he knows how to treat a lady, maybe he&#039;s learned to not blow the mortgage payment on a weekend bender; I say this as a recovering pants-thief. If he really believes in protecting his lady fair, he&#039;ll know that it will hurt her feelings if they start receiving foreclosure notices. A chivalrous gent will call a plumber, when he realizes that he doesn&#039;t have a clue. He will lay claim to her when an interloper makes an untoward comment, because he gives a damn about protecting his interests, not because he doesn&#039;t think she can&#039;t. 

There&#039;s something oddly erotic about the formality, as well. You both know when there are sparks. But, there&#039;s something more intimate about the subtlety. You&#039;re both anticipating your time to be informal, and can&#039;t wait. He brushes your neck when he takes your coat, the way he holds your hand, getting out of the car, taking your arm and pulling you close while walking... it&#039;s on your mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chivalry is most welcome; please let it come back into fashion. Even if it seems a bit silly to wait around for him to be impractical (like exiting a car), I kind of like seeing his effort. His chivalrous gestures scream &#8220;I was not raised by wolves! Please consider me!&#8221; It makes me think he&#8217;s looking for a lady, rather than a lay. </p>
<p>Taking away a suitor&#8217;s chance to wear the pants is lame. Let him show you his goods. Let him strut. If things keep going well, you&#8217;re going to want to know he knows how to be a man, beyond cosmetic manners. If he knows how to treat a lady, maybe he&#8217;s learned to not blow the mortgage payment on a weekend bender; I say this as a recovering pants-thief. If he really believes in protecting his lady fair, he&#8217;ll know that it will hurt her feelings if they start receiving foreclosure notices. A chivalrous gent will call a plumber, when he realizes that he doesn&#8217;t have a clue. He will lay claim to her when an interloper makes an untoward comment, because he gives a damn about protecting his interests, not because he doesn&#8217;t think she can&#8217;t. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s something oddly erotic about the formality, as well. You both know when there are sparks. But, there&#8217;s something more intimate about the subtlety. You&#8217;re both anticipating your time to be informal, and can&#8217;t wait. He brushes your neck when he takes your coat, the way he holds your hand, getting out of the car, taking your arm and pulling you close while walking&#8230; it&#8217;s on your mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -R</title>
		<link>http://www.emandlo.com/2009/06/wise-guys-whats-the-deal-with-chivalry/comment-page-1/#comment-2917</link>
		<dc:creator>-R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emandlo.com/?p=3624#comment-2917</guid>
		<description>The trouble is that the social goalposts have moved since the rules of chivalry were first drawn up. Not only do women have greater parity in pay and independence but there&#039;s also the fact that the sexes spend much more time together. Gone are the days where the men would shoot and the ladies take tea before coming together at dinner. Chivalry is much for effective in smaller measure; I think anyone exposed to 18 solid hours of social condescension would ultimately find it a little tiring .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trouble is that the social goalposts have moved since the rules of chivalry were first drawn up. Not only do women have greater parity in pay and independence but there&#8217;s also the fact that the sexes spend much more time together. Gone are the days where the men would shoot and the ladies take tea before coming together at dinner. Chivalry is much for effective in smaller measure; I think anyone exposed to 18 solid hours of social condescension would ultimately find it a little tiring .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: searchingwithin</title>
		<link>http://www.emandlo.com/2009/06/wise-guys-whats-the-deal-with-chivalry/comment-page-1/#comment-2913</link>
		<dc:creator>searchingwithin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emandlo.com/?p=3624#comment-2913</guid>
		<description>Chivalry and courtesy is not stating that a woman is frail or weak in my opinion, but rather showing her respect and treating her like a Queen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chivalry and courtesy is not stating that a woman is frail or weak in my opinion, but rather showing her respect and treating her like a Queen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady Tarrant</title>
		<link>http://www.emandlo.com/2009/06/wise-guys-whats-the-deal-with-chivalry/comment-page-1/#comment-2873</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady Tarrant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emandlo.com/?p=3624#comment-2873</guid>
		<description>Yes, chivalry is damn fucking cool. 

A note concerning who gets the check: Courting gives a man the chance to convince a female that he’s not just another prick, but is worth her valuable time. As such, the man should pay for the dates as long as they’re dating, because HE&#039;S courting her, not vice versa. However, once it becomes a steady relationship, then sure, going dutch or she treats him is just fine.

Back to chivalry: Chivalry goes hand in hand with courting, but it most certainly doesn’t stop there. It is to a degree, a code of conduct, but it also a mind set. Treating others with due courtesy and respect should not be considered a bad thing, and that is ultimately what chivalry is supposed to be. Over-dramatization, such as outlined by Johnny should not be condoned, but perhaps these people just need some direction instead of criticism. Hey, at least they’re trying, which is a lot better than the pricks who think they’re entitled to treat a girl anyway they want just be their ego says so.

Also regarding Jay Jay’s and Nick’s post: We females have a RESPONSIBILITY to show appreciation and respect for a man who treats us with good manners. It’s hardly fair for females to bitch about there being no good men left, when they (the females) are stepping all over a man who goes the extra mile for her. Rudeness only breeds rudeness and hostility. 

 As for not liking to be treating like a frail object, well, I don’t like it either. But I’m secure enough in myself that if a man gets a door, the check, my coat, pulls out a chair, or gives me his coat, I somehow manage not get my panties in a bunch. I realize that he is being CONSIDERATE and is making an EFFORT. If for some reason I get the impression that he’s being overbearing or domineering, I let him know that he’s going a bit overboard--nicely. Because, after all, the poor bastard may not realize how he’s coming off, and we don’t need to contribute to making nice guys into assholes. And if he really is just an ass, then I don’t mind him paying at all; hell, he owes me at least dinner at that point.

Last note: If a woman feels threatened by a man holding a door open for her, then mayhap she needs to take those sorts of issues up with her therapist. That sort of lack of self confidence is just unhealthy.
I know it was a long post so if you got this far, Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, chivalry is damn fucking cool. </p>
<p>A note concerning who gets the check: Courting gives a man the chance to convince a female that he’s not just another prick, but is worth her valuable time. As such, the man should pay for the dates as long as they’re dating, because HE&#8217;S courting her, not vice versa. However, once it becomes a steady relationship, then sure, going dutch or she treats him is just fine.</p>
<p>Back to chivalry: Chivalry goes hand in hand with courting, but it most certainly doesn’t stop there. It is to a degree, a code of conduct, but it also a mind set. Treating others with due courtesy and respect should not be considered a bad thing, and that is ultimately what chivalry is supposed to be. Over-dramatization, such as outlined by Johnny should not be condoned, but perhaps these people just need some direction instead of criticism. Hey, at least they’re trying, which is a lot better than the pricks who think they’re entitled to treat a girl anyway they want just be their ego says so.</p>
<p>Also regarding Jay Jay’s and Nick’s post: We females have a RESPONSIBILITY to show appreciation and respect for a man who treats us with good manners. It’s hardly fair for females to bitch about there being no good men left, when they (the females) are stepping all over a man who goes the extra mile for her. Rudeness only breeds rudeness and hostility. </p>
<p> As for not liking to be treating like a frail object, well, I don’t like it either. But I’m secure enough in myself that if a man gets a door, the check, my coat, pulls out a chair, or gives me his coat, I somehow manage not get my panties in a bunch. I realize that he is being CONSIDERATE and is making an EFFORT. If for some reason I get the impression that he’s being overbearing or domineering, I let him know that he’s going a bit overboard&#8211;nicely. Because, after all, the poor bastard may not realize how he’s coming off, and we don’t need to contribute to making nice guys into assholes. And if he really is just an ass, then I don’t mind him paying at all; hell, he owes me at least dinner at that point.</p>
<p>Last note: If a woman feels threatened by a man holding a door open for her, then mayhap she needs to take those sorts of issues up with her therapist. That sort of lack of self confidence is just unhealthy.<br />
I know it was a long post so if you got this far, Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trouble</title>
		<link>http://www.emandlo.com/2009/06/wise-guys-whats-the-deal-with-chivalry/comment-page-1/#comment-2854</link>
		<dc:creator>Trouble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emandlo.com/?p=3624#comment-2854</guid>
		<description>For me it is about respect and manners - and the difference as mentioned already between courtesy and chivalry. As a woman, I hold doors open for anyone coming behind me, or towards me, or with bags in their hands, I will help people with shopping etc, will give up my seat to someone who may, if they wish, need it more than me (people with a walking stick, pregnant people or just folks who look exhausted and as though they need someone to be kind to them and give them a break). 

I like to help people out with change at toilets that have a charge, or entertain someone&#039;s kid in the shop queue while their parent pays the bill or help carry someone&#039;s pram up stairs etc. 

On dates I think it is a fine balance on the who pays for things - I don&#039;t like men who insist on paying, in fact that will put a big no-no next to them for me - at the same time there is nothing nicer than being &#039;treated&#039; - and both genders can do that. Have to say if a couple can&#039;t figure out their comfort zone on this one then it might be a sign of future issues! Put it this way, so long as your courtesy makes the person feel happy and loved (by their definition not yours) rather than patronised or condescended too because of their age/gender etc then it is all good. My favourite example of courtesy is my hubby sitting &#039;tap end&#039; when we share a bath!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me it is about respect and manners &#8211; and the difference as mentioned already between courtesy and chivalry. As a woman, I hold doors open for anyone coming behind me, or towards me, or with bags in their hands, I will help people with shopping etc, will give up my seat to someone who may, if they wish, need it more than me (people with a walking stick, pregnant people or just folks who look exhausted and as though they need someone to be kind to them and give them a break). </p>
<p>I like to help people out with change at toilets that have a charge, or entertain someone&#8217;s kid in the shop queue while their parent pays the bill or help carry someone&#8217;s pram up stairs etc. </p>
<p>On dates I think it is a fine balance on the who pays for things &#8211; I don&#8217;t like men who insist on paying, in fact that will put a big no-no next to them for me &#8211; at the same time there is nothing nicer than being &#8216;treated&#8217; &#8211; and both genders can do that. Have to say if a couple can&#8217;t figure out their comfort zone on this one then it might be a sign of future issues! Put it this way, so long as your courtesy makes the person feel happy and loved (by their definition not yours) rather than patronised or condescended too because of their age/gender etc then it is all good. My favourite example of courtesy is my hubby sitting &#8216;tap end&#8217; when we share a bath!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlanK</title>
		<link>http://www.emandlo.com/2009/06/wise-guys-whats-the-deal-with-chivalry/comment-page-1/#comment-2852</link>
		<dc:creator>AlanK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emandlo.com/?p=3624#comment-2852</guid>
		<description>This is a little silly. Some of the rules of &quot;chivalry&quot; are just useful ways of getting through life: somebody has to be the first through the door, and the arbitrary rule is older before younger, man after woman. Somebody has to keep the door from slamming in your face. Walking on the &quot;street&quot; side no longer is necessary to protect your companion from horses, but you have to walk on one side or the other and paying attention to it means you&#039;re paying attention to her.

Some of the rules are erotic: pulling out a chair, standing when a woman enters or leaves, are ways of showing attention and making &quot;casual&quot; physical contact.

Some of the rules are archaic but have been long modified. Men need not give up their seats to healthy women, but both should give up their seats to the frail or elderly. Some are archaic but amusing if done with flair. No man should think of ordering for a lady but it simplifies everyone&#039;s life if...after determining her preferences...he orders for both.

Some of the rules are part of normal courtesy. The one who asks, pays, unless the invitation is clearly one of &quot;would you like to also get tickets and join us.&quot; It is an amusing minor courtesy for a woman to offer to pay her share on a first or second date, but everyone knows this is a question for which the answer is &quot;no.&quot; Conversely, hospitality must be repaid, but only at an appropriate financial level: if I can afford opera tickets and you can afford movie tickets, please ask me to the movies. PIcking a movie I would like shows more consideration than paying a fortune for a concert I wouldn&#039;t like.

If you don&#039;t like a ritual, just say so. Simply be aware that almost all our current courtesies are simply that...courtesies. Courtship is, or should be, a dance. If you don&#039;t want to dance, fine. You&#039;re missing something. I personally would not be interested in someone whose idea of wooing was saying &quot;hey baby, what about it?&quot; If you are, feel free to ignore this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a little silly. Some of the rules of &#8220;chivalry&#8221; are just useful ways of getting through life: somebody has to be the first through the door, and the arbitrary rule is older before younger, man after woman. Somebody has to keep the door from slamming in your face. Walking on the &#8220;street&#8221; side no longer is necessary to protect your companion from horses, but you have to walk on one side or the other and paying attention to it means you&#8217;re paying attention to her.</p>
<p>Some of the rules are erotic: pulling out a chair, standing when a woman enters or leaves, are ways of showing attention and making &#8220;casual&#8221; physical contact.</p>
<p>Some of the rules are archaic but have been long modified. Men need not give up their seats to healthy women, but both should give up their seats to the frail or elderly. Some are archaic but amusing if done with flair. No man should think of ordering for a lady but it simplifies everyone&#8217;s life if&#8230;after determining her preferences&#8230;he orders for both.</p>
<p>Some of the rules are part of normal courtesy. The one who asks, pays, unless the invitation is clearly one of &#8220;would you like to also get tickets and join us.&#8221; It is an amusing minor courtesy for a woman to offer to pay her share on a first or second date, but everyone knows this is a question for which the answer is &#8220;no.&#8221; Conversely, hospitality must be repaid, but only at an appropriate financial level: if I can afford opera tickets and you can afford movie tickets, please ask me to the movies. PIcking a movie I would like shows more consideration than paying a fortune for a concert I wouldn&#8217;t like.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like a ritual, just say so. Simply be aware that almost all our current courtesies are simply that&#8230;courtesies. Courtship is, or should be, a dance. If you don&#8217;t want to dance, fine. You&#8217;re missing something. I personally would not be interested in someone whose idea of wooing was saying &#8220;hey baby, what about it?&#8221; If you are, feel free to ignore this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.emandlo.com/2009/06/wise-guys-whats-the-deal-with-chivalry/comment-page-1/#comment-2848</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emandlo.com/?p=3624#comment-2848</guid>
		<description>Figleaf&#039;s right - courtesy goes way, way beyond good manners. A truly &quot;chivalrous&quot; guy would never dream of sullying his purest love by, say, giving her a squirting orgasm. 

Women don&#039;t want chivalry. They want respect and courtesy. All those wet-towel weenies you dumped, the ones who paid for everything and held out your chair and drove you all over the place but never busted a move? They were chivalrous. That meat head who gets into a fist-fight over you because he thinks another meat head insulted your honor?  Also chivalrous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Figleaf&#8217;s right &#8211; courtesy goes way, way beyond good manners. A truly &#8220;chivalrous&#8221; guy would never dream of sullying his purest love by, say, giving her a squirting orgasm. </p>
<p>Women don&#8217;t want chivalry. They want respect and courtesy. All those wet-towel weenies you dumped, the ones who paid for everything and held out your chair and drove you all over the place but never busted a move? They were chivalrous. That meat head who gets into a fist-fight over you because he thinks another meat head insulted your honor?  Also chivalrous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.emandlo.com @ 2012-02-08 21:51:45 -->
