Em & Lo's RSS Feed Em & Lo's Daily Email Feed Be Our Facebook Friend! Follow Us on Twitter!

Halloween on Amazon

Buy on Amazon Kindle!

Good Vibes Bat Crop

LEVI's on Amazon


Reports of the G-spot’s Nonexistence Are Vastly Exaggerated

Thu, Jan 7, 2010

News, Research

photo by liz_noise

If you believe the screaming headlines this week, it turns out that after all these years — drumroll please — the G-spot does not exist. That’s right, ladies and gentlemen, the hunt is off!¬†According to the U.K. Daily Telegraph, “Researchers at King‚Äôs College London claim there is no evidence for the existence of the G-spot ‚Äď supposedly a cluster of internal nerve endings ‚Äď beyond a woman‚Äôs imagination.” In other words, please put down your G-spotters and go home.

Except. The so-called proof in this study is that they asked 1,800 women, all pairs of identical or non-identical twins, if they had a G-spot. Because identical twins share all their genes (while non-identical share only 50%), they figured that if one identical twin reported having a G-spot, then her sister was more likely to report having one two. But, um, what if one twin had a better G-spotting toy than the other? What if one twin had never tried out intercourse positions that stimulated the G-spot?

Read the rest of this post on SUNfiltered

, , , ,

 

2 Responses to “Reports of the G-spot’s Nonexistence Are Vastly Exaggerated”

  1. nikkisha Says:

    im glad that i finally know there is NO G-spot. cause i been searching. and failed miserably =[

  2. K Says:

    …you realize that the main point of this post is that studies which claim “There officially is no G-Spot!” are erroneous and not at all valid, right? Because this article is not saying there is no G-Spot, it’s saying there is no valid research to support the idea that there is no G-Spot.


Leave a Reply