Em & Lo's RSS Feed Em & Lo's Daily Email Feed Be Our Facebook Friend! Follow Us on Twitter!

LEVI's on Amazon

Good Vibes Cupcake

Buy on Amazon Kindle!

Sandals on Amazon


Kids of Lesbian Parents May Fare Better Than Their Peers

Tue, Jun 8, 2010

News, Research

photo by daspaz

A new study analyzing long-term data on kids from birth to adulthood just came out that suggests children of lesbian parents do better than their peers. According to Time:

The authors found that children raised by lesbian mothers – whether the mother was partnered or single – scored very similarly to children raised by heterosexual parents on measures of development and social behavior. These findings were expected, the authors said; however, they were surprised to discover that children in lesbian homes scored higher than kids in straight families on some psychological measures of self-esteem and confidence, did better academically and were less likely to have behavioral problems, such as rule-breaking and aggression.

Read the rest of this post on SUNfiltered

, , , , ,

 

3 Responses to “Kids of Lesbian Parents May Fare Better Than Their Peers”

  1. TheCraig Says:

    It may be surprising to some…but it makes sense. A lesbian couple has to go more out of their way to have kids; they’re more likely to be sure they’re at the right place in their life, and truly want them in advance. A straight couple can just sort of stumble into it. It’s easy for things to be accidental, even if a child isn’t unwelcome.

    Is it any wonder that those who have to be a lot more intentional about the process might be statistically more likely to provide a nurturing household?

  2. philipp Says:

    As a sidenote from somebody who is working in research – being peer-reviewed does not at all mean that the material is trustable. I know from (independent) studies in the area of computer science which came to the conclusion that other than rejecting the weakest of all material (about the worst 25% of all research papers), results of peer review were found to have almost no correlation with the later impact (that is, it’s ‘quality’ in a scientific context) of the material. Similar experiences have been brought up in almost all research disciplines that I know of, including medicine.

    Not that I don’t believe that the results may be right, but we gotta be fair here – this is just another biased study paid by a lobbyist group, and as such should not be trusted.

  3. Kidder Kaper Says:

    This totally makes sense to me.


Leave a Reply