All posts by Lo Sharkey

Why Kids Need Extracurricular Sex Ed
Lo is the founder of The Butterfly Academy, an extracurricular sex ed organization for kids and their caregivers.

Think of all the ways we as parents and guardians try to broaden our kids’ horizons when we’re able to. We might:

  • sign them up for sports so they stay healthy with exercise and learn the importance of discipline and teamwork.
  • send them to summer camps to commune with nature instead of screens.
  • insist they take music lessons or join band to help their brains work in creative and mathematical ways.
  • bring them to church to cultivate a sense of spirituality.
  • enroll them in art or dance or drama classes to spark their imaginations.
  • encourage them to join clubs or student government so they can learn to work within a community to get things done.
  • even get tutors or test prep courses or older siblings to help them better grasp their schoolwork and master their educational demands.

But there’s one key area of our kids’ development that we, as parents and guardians, consistently ignore: their relational education.

“My daughter went under protest; I told her she had to try it once.  Now she wants to come every time!”

— Parent of a 7th grade participant

Interpersonal relationships, intimacy and sexuality will eventually impact our children’s personalities, drive many of their actions, often lead to great joy, and sometimes cause great pain. After all, intimate relationships at any stage of life can involve emotional pitfalls and physical risks. Our child may never master an instrument, become a star athlete, or ace the SATs, but they will most likely eventually have partnered sex. And probably sooner than we’d expect or prefer.

Yet we as parents and caregivers rarely give our kids extra tools to help them better navigate this realm. We often just leave it to fate and hope they don’t get hurt…or hurt someone else.

“My daughter came away with exactly the message promised by the Butterfly Academy’s Period Party workshop: ‘I’ve got this, I know what to do, and it’s kind of cool that I get periods, it’s something awesome my body does.’ So yay!”

— Parent of a 6th grade participant

Unfortunately, we can’t only rely on schools to provide our kids a truly comprehensive sex-and-relationship education — schools often don’t have the time, the resources, the state mandates, and, in some cases, the full support of the community to address all the complexities of this arena — and there are many. The usual suspects include puberty, anatomy, STIs (sexually transmitted infections), reproduction and pregnancy — the subtleties of which may not get addressed in the average school health class. But what about communication, consent vs. coercion, boundary setting, gender stereotypes, gender identity, sexual orientation, personal agency, body image, pleasure, diversity, dealing with rejection, pervasive pornography, guilt, slut-shaming, social media, sexting, trust and justice, to name a few?

“I would recommend this to all my friends!”

— 6th grade participant

NY State does not mandate sex education (only HIV education), which means any sex education given in schools is not required to be comprehensive, medically accurate, unbiased or secular. Even if you already have an open dialogue with your kids about relationships and sexuality — which is fantastic and essential, bravo! — there are still limits to those discussions: you may be missing certain topics and different perspectives; your child may not feel comfortable discussing everything with you; ; keeping these talks behind closed doors just within your family can project the message that these topics are secret, shameful, and/or inappropriate. There is enormous benefit in community learning, especially regarding topics that don’t often get discussed openly and honestly in public.  

“Loved it!”

— How the majority of participants in the inaugural Butterfly Academy workshop rated the experience on their class evaluations.

The #MeToo movement has made it painfully clear that people need help.  Adulthood doesn’t magically grant a person intimate communication skills and respect for one’s self and others overnight. Relationship literacy is not innate; it is taught and learned.  And that education has to start early, be age-appropriate, and continue throughout one’s life. You don’t take one cooking lesson in 7th-grade FACS/Home Ec. and expect to become the next Julia Child without any further education!  How can we expect our kids to be able to confidently say no to sexual peer pressure, to courageously stand up against witnessed or experienced prejudice and abuse, to eventually enjoy the pleasures of their bodies when they’re ready safely and without shame, to effectively protect themselves from unwanted pregnancies & STIs, to think critically about porn, and to understand that intimacy with a partner is not something given or taken but consensually, respectfully, mutually enjoyed if we don’t give them the proper education to do so?

“I credit you and your Butterfly Academy class for helping puberty to be no big deal. Thank you!”

— Parent of a 5th grade participant

There’s so much more to decent sex ed than learning that the pituitary gland kickstarts puberty, a sperm fertilizes an egg, and condoms don’t offer complete protection against all STIs. There’s also respect and acceptance and justice. And these values apply not only to sex, gender, and orientation, but also to race, religion, ability, class, age, and national origin. Quality extracurricular relational education can be a powerful tool for positive social change. So we parents and guardians need to make it a priority, to think of it as essential to our kids’ emotional, intellectual and spiritual growth just as much as team sports, piano lessons, church retreats, or summer camps can be. The results of such efforts can transform the next generation and generations to come, reducing widespread miscommunication, entrenched prejudices, and casual abuse.

Butterfly Academy workshops may be one more thing you have to sign your kids up for,* but their personal wellbeing — both physical and emotional — is well worth it.

*The Butterfly Academy offers a sliding scale — no one is turned away.
Check Out Lo’s Org: The Butterfly Academy!

A few years ago, a series of big events occurred, one right after the other, that profoundly shifted my career goals:

  • The election of an alleged serial sexual predator to the highest office in the land
  • The #MeToo Movement
  • My daughter’s first experience with public school sex education (here’s the video they watched!)

That perfect storm made it painfully clear that we as a country and a culture are not where we need to be in the sex-education department. Sure, adults need sex ed too, but maybe if we empowered young people with decent health and wellbeing information early and often, then they wouldn’t need so much help once they grew up!

So I turned my attention to educating kids and their caregivers, to do more face-to-face teaching. And I knew the best way to approach such work with this population was with the proper credentials. In 2018, I began the process of advanced education through the nationally-accredited, graduate-level program for educators at The Institute of Sexuality Education and Enlightenment — and today, not only am I an official Certified Holistic Sex Educator through ISEE, I’m one of only a handful of AASECT Certified Sex Educators in New York State!

In 2019, I launched The Butterfly Academy, an extracurricular relational education organization for kids and their parents/guardians/caregivers/teachers/mentors to learn about healthy relationships, anatomy, puberty, gender and identity, orientation and attraction, what sex is, how babies get made, consent, communication, responsibility, cyber and tech smarts, and body positivity. Initially, I was offering in-person classes in the Hudson Valley where I live. But then covid hit. So I moved all classes online, which actually, serendipitously meant I could teach kids in other states! So far, the reviews from both students and parents have been overwhelmingly positive! Watch the video below to see some of these reviews; click here to read some more.

The Butterfly Academy is still in it’s cocoon stage as a company: small but growing! Below is a list of current and future offerings. If you have kids, or niblings (nieces & nephews), or friends with kids, I hope you’ll check out TheButterflyAcademy.com and consider spreading the word! The more young people have access to better sex ed, the less miscommunication, entrenched prejudices, and casual abuse there will be in their world — the happier and healthier their relationships will be.

CURRENT BUTTERFLY ACADEMY WORKSHOPS!

Middle School Survival Club: An Enlightening Workshop Series to Help Teens Better Navigate Growing Up

Puberty can be tough: big bodily changes, roller-coaster hormonal fluctuations, crushes, peer & social media pressure . . . the list goes on. Kids don’t often get all the support & information they need to navigate this new world safely, confidently & happily. This series gives kids a safer space to receive good info, discuss sensitive topics, ask questions & get honest, accurate, inclusive answers.

Unfortunately, many states don’t mandate sex education. For example, in New York state, only HIV education is mandated, which means any sex education given in schools is not required to be comprehensive, medically accurate, unbiased or secular. Even if you already have an open dialogue with your kids about sex — which is fantastic and essential, bravo! — there are still topics and perspectives you may be missing, your child may not feel comfortable discussing everything with you, and there is enormous benefit in community learning, especially regarding topics that don’t often get discussed openly and honestly in public. Learn more…

Period Party! An Empowering 2-Hour Education on All Things Menstruation

People with periods can spend up to 10 years menstruating over their lifetime — yes, a full decade! The topic certainly deserves some deliberate, dedicated attention that’s both positive and community-based. Our aim with this workshop is to 1) increase kids’ knowledge of how to deal with periods confidently and effectively, 2) debunk myths while challenging negative attitudes surrounding menstruation, and 3) reduce any shame or fear kids may have about this amazing bodily superpower! Learn more…

BUTTERFLY ACADEMY WORKSHOPS COMING SOON!

My First Health Class: An Introductory Workshop for 1st & 2nd Graders

The Growing Up Club: Four 1-hour Workshops for 3rd-5th Graders on 1) how families are made, 2) puberty, 3) gender, and 4) consent.

High School Survival Club: An Enlightening Workshop Series to Help Teens Better Navigate Growing Up

How to Have the Talks: A Parents’ Workshop on How to Create & Maintain an Open Dialogue with Their Kids

Parent Date Night: A Fun Evening for Couples with Kids to Reconnect & Reimagine Their Relationships

Your Love Life During & After Pregnancy: What to Expect Sex-, Relationship- & Body-Wise When You’re Expecting

Peri Party! A Workshop for Menopausal Moms (from Peri to Post) on Being “The Change” They Want to See

Need more convincing?
Learn Why Kids NEED Extracurricular Sex Ed

How to Give a Sex Ed Lesson at a Slumber Party

A dad friend of mine, who’d read my recent piece on making sexual assault in the news a teachable moment for kids, forwarded me the following tweet from Andi Zeisler while I was in the middle of my 11-year-old’s birthday slumber party:

I wrote back to my friend, “So awesome! I may have to follow her lead tonight.”

I thought about it: Not only am I a parent, I’m a sex educator currently getting certification from the Institute for Sexuality Education with a captive audience of five kids at various stages of puberty who are in a trusted, safe space. Why wouldn’t I take this opportunity to encourage a little body positivity, boundary setting and information sharing?

Of course, I had to get the parents’ permission first. So while the kids were watching Jumanji, I texted them:

I have an idea, but I won’t do it unless every one of you is comfortable with it: I give the kids scraps of paper & pens and they can anonymously write down any questions they have about puberty or bodies, put them in a secret box, and then I could only answer the age-appropriate ones tomorrow without disclosing who said what (i.e. rephrasing & rewriting them so as not to give anyone away). What do you think? I imagine there’s a good chance they wouldn’t take advantage of the opportunity even if I gave it to them. But if any of you think it’s a bad idea, I won’t do it. Write me back privately with your thoughts. Thx!

Fortunately, I’m good friends with all the parents of my kid’s friends. We share many of the same values. We talk about talking about sex with our kids. I recommend books to them, like Parenting Beyond Pink & Blue for them and Sex Is a Funny Word for their kids. They know and trust me. (One would certainly hope that’s the case when sleepovers are involved.) So they all immediately gave me the green light. One texted: “The more [my daughter] gets of that, in different settings and different ways, the better, I think.”

(Had I gotten even one “No,” I wouldn’t have done it. Though I probably would have tried to have a one-on-one with that person later, on our own time, to discover what they perceived any potential problems to be. So often our own adult discomfort with sex keeps us from having the important talks on the topic with our kids. But demystification is key, our own hang-ups be damned!)

When the kids were winding down for the night in their sleeping bags playing “Would You Rather” (with parent-approved fortune-cookie-style questions pulled out of a little fish bowl, such as “Would you rather discover a living dinosaur or an alien from outer space?”), I popped in with some scraps of paper, sharpened pencils and an emptied box of Kleenex.

“Hey y’all, I’ve got another fun thing for you to do! I think most of you know I’m a health and sex ed writer. So you can secretly write down any question you want – about puberty or bodies or periods or whatever – any question at all! Fold it up, put it in this box, and then I’ll answer them in the morning.”

Their reactions were all over the map. My own daughter groaned “Oh, come on, Mom!” and buried her face in her pillow. Another said enthusiastically, “Oooooh, I’ve got a bunch of questions!”, grabbed a bunch of scraps of paper, and started scribbling furiously. One friend quietly followed her lead. Another proudly said she didn’t have any questions. Still another seemed pretty uncomfortable with the whole endeavor: “I don’t want to. I had ‘The Talk’ with my mom so I don’t need to do this.”

“That is so great you’ve talked to your mom,” I said gently, “but it’s also good to keep having ongoing conversations about this stuff because questions will keep popping up as you continue to grow up.” While the rest of the kids jotted down a question or two – including my daughter, who ultimately couldn’t resist participating – this one just got under her blanket and turned her back to the group, as if she were ready to go to sleep. I didn’t push her.

As the other girls stuffed their folded-up notes into the Kleenex box, I led them in a call and response:

Me: “Who’s the boss of your body?”
Kids: “I am!”
Me: “Who’s allowed to touch your body?”
Kids: variations on “Only me and those who get my permission!”
Me: “What do you do if someone ever makes you feel uncomfortable?”
Kids: “Tell an adult you trust/my parents/my mom!”
Me: “Girl power, woooo!”
My daughter: “Ok, can you please leave now?”

The questions turned out to be mostly (pretty hilarious) jokes with a few semi-serious ones sprinkled in. But I didn’t want to answer them in person over scrambled eggs and pancakes the next morning, for fear of causing the one kid further discomfort. Plus, I figured answering more than a question or two would feel too much like school to them when all they wanted to do was play Mario Kart.

Instead, I wanted to type up all the questions so they were anonymous, write down my answers, print out five copies, put each in a sealed envelope, and place them in their goodie bags. I checked in with all the parents to make sure this was okay and asked if they wanted to review the document first (they didn’t.) So when each kid got picked up to go home, I quietly explained the Q&As were in the bag and, if they were interested, they could read them privately or share with their parents, in their own time. I also emailed the document to all the parents, requesting that they let their children take the lead on any discussions (and thus not break the sanctity of the sacred slumber party):

All the Sleepover Questions That Were Asked

Don’t periods go at the end of sentences?
Yes, if we’re talking about punctuation.

Will Zac Efron marry me?
Probably not.

Do pandas go through puberty?
All animals, from groundhogs to geckos, go through a transition period as they grow up and reach “sexual maturity,” a.k.a. the ability to reproduce. Nonhuman primates like monkeys, chimpanzees and gorillas go through many of the same biological changes that humans do in puberty, like changing body shapes; some primates go through a change that humans do NOT go through: their butt color changes to red! It seems the list of animals that actually menstruate is pretty short: humans, apes and monkeys (like those mentioned before), bats and elephant shrews. Pandas don’t have periods.

Doesn’t hair grow on your head?
Yes it does. It also grows on other parts of your body, including armpits and the genital area once you start going through puberty. It also grows, in varying degrees, all over your body: arms, legs, back, feet, face, chest, around the nipples, around the anus, etc. While men generally tend to be a little hairier than women, it is totally NORMAL for girls and women to have body hair, sometimes lots of it! Body hair is totally natural. Keep in mind, companies and corporations will sometimes make up a fake “problem” (e.g. “Women shouldn’t have body hair”) just so they can sell you a product (like razors) to “fix it” and make money. It’s totally up to you what you do with your body hair, wherever it grows – whether you want to style it, cut it, color it, or leave it alone and love it!

Why do people eat each other’s faces when they kiss?
Sometimes it may look like that – when it does, it usually means the people kissing are very passionate about each other. But there are lots of different ways to kiss.

Why do boobs get big?
Hormones that kick in during puberty make some people’s breasts get bigger — how much bigger depends on the person. Some people remain fairly flat-chested, others get very full breasts, others are somewhere in between. If a person with a uterus and ovaries decides to get pregnant and deliver a baby, they may decide to breastfeed — the bodily changes that started happening at puberty along with the ones that kicked in during pregnancy make breastfeeding possible.

Why do people stick their penises in other people’s vaginas?
The term for this is P&V intercourse. The most common reason people have intercourse is for physical pleasure and closeness with a trusted, romantic partner; another reason might be to try to get pregnant. There are many ways to enjoy physical pleasure and closeness with a trusted, romantic partner that do not include intercourse (for example, hand holding, kissing, touching). There are also other ways to have a baby that do not include intercourse (for example, adoption or a medical process known as In Vitro Fertilization [IVF]).

What is the meaning of life?
The meaning of life is 42. (Read the novel The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy for more info.)

If you have any more questions, please know you can always come to me – or any of your parents – for answers.

I followed up with the parents: some kids read the letter privately and kept the Q&As to themselves, others shared them enthusiastically with their parents. The one child who didn’t really enjoy the exercise did end up reviewing the answers with her mom, but she (the kid, not the mom) chose to skip the penis-vagina question. Her mother later told me, “I do force the issue as much as I can so that I know she has the information she needs, but it is not at all comfortable for her. I’m really glad you brought it up in a group setting so she could see that her friends will talk openly with a trusted adult.”

Another mom, whose daughter lost a tooth in the middle of the night during that sleepover, texted me: “I love that they’re at the age where they’re still losing teeth but also able to discuss issues of consent.”

The author of that tweet above about the boys’ slumber party got a lot of blowback, a lot of How dare yous. She ended up responding, “Calm your tits, it was a joke.” But it shouldn’t be. This is how we help give kids agency and autonomy over their bodies, how we teach them to respect themselves and others: we talk about anatomy and puberty and sex and consent, openly and honestly, probably earlier than you might think or want to, in public, with friends, and without shame.

Afraid your kids will hear about all the sexual assault in the news?
Kavanaugh Is a Teachable Moment

10 Practical Ways Parents Can Fight Rape Culture

The powerful, unapologetic, detailed statement of Brock Turner’s rape victim made public recently touched a collective nerve, resulting in a huge outcry on social media about the rape culture that left him convicted of three sexual assault felonies but only serving 6 months in jail. The outcry, which has already begun to fade, has often narrowly focused on this one criminal and his inept judge. But, while singling out these two as hideous examples of injustice is important and necessary, we also need to take steps as a society and as individual members of that society to ensure we don’t keep raising, enabling and apologizing for legions of Brocks. Because when you look at the statistics, they’re everywhere.

So here are 10 real-world ways parents can help stop the sexual assault epidemic by raising conscientious kids, both male and female. A few things to keep in mind: First, by addressing the way we raise girls, we are not engaging in victim blaming or rape apologia; we simply hope to help girls feel empowered to fight back against the rape culture they grow up in. Next, for the sake of simplicity, we’re mostly dealing with heterosexuality here, though we of course acknowledge that rape within and against the LGBTQI community is a serious problem. And finally, much of this advice relates to decent, comprehensive sex education as an indirect defense against rape culture, because knowledge is power.

1. Stop dividing boys and girls into “us vs. them” groups.

We as humans like to put things into neat, well-defined categories; it helps our brains process the overwhelming amount of info we’re bombarded with daily and has allowed us to thrive as a species. But that tendency prevents us from realizing how girls and boys are far more alike than they are different and ultimately promotes harmful, limiting stereotypes. It’s a bad habit we fall into before kids are even out of the womb, gendering clothes and baby rooms, even altering the way we talk to them through tummies. Dividing them into two different, distinct groups automatically creates out-group animosity, which casts the “other” as foreign, antagonistic, and inferior – but boys don’t get the balancing effect of being taught to be likable, agreeable, and kind the way girls often are.

Parenting Beyond Pink and Blue by Christia Spears Brown, Ph.D., is a fantastic book with lots of practical ways for combating gender stereotypes, like buying gender neutral toys and encouraging cross-gender play, having co-ed playdates and birthday parties, not referring to children as “girls” and “boys” but rather “kids” or “students,” the list goes on… For more examples and quick info, read our review of Brown’s book here.

2. Foster boys’ emotional development.

One big way we separate boys from girls is by disconnecting boys from their emotional lives: talking to them less about everything, but especially their feelings; telling them not to cry and to “be a man”; expecting them to be tough and hardened in the face of adversity; casting them as sexual aggressors from an early age (how many times have you heard someone say a little baby boy is “flirting” with you, or a male preschooler is going to be a “lady killer”?), and being less forthcoming with physical and emotional affection.

In doing so, we create less empathic, sympathetic kids who denigrate all the good, gender-neutral qualities that our society ties to femininity. While you’re at it, take it easy on the violent TV shows, movies and video games, and offer more educational and emotionally deep media (and don’t make fun of them when they cry at the sad scenes!). The The Mask You Live In — a documentary by Jennifer Siebel Newsom about boys’ struggle to be authentic within the narrow confines of society’s definition of masculinity — is required viewing.

3. Encourage girls to stand up for themselves as strong, independent, empowered individuals.

Rather than encouraging girls to be mild-mannered, agreeable, courteously quiet and space-saving, teach them to have a big voice and to use it. Make sure they know if something ever makes them uncomfortable, they have every right to firmly say so and/or walk away from the situation. Ban most Disney princess movies and Barbie; instead enroll them in a martial arts class that emphasizes strength, independence, and self-defense. Unfortunately, it’s vital that girls these days have some experience with self-defense. Without it, girls can sometimes be overpowered. That’s why self-defense can really benefit girls, teaching them to be able to stand up for themselves and fight back. Of course, some girls can even carry a weapon for self-defense purposes. Having the best survival knife on your person at all times can help girls to protect themselves from potential attackers. It’s good to have that sort of weapon to defend yourself, just like some people prefer to have a firearm on them for self-defense purposes too. But this should only be done after reading something like this Boberg Arms – XR45 Subcompact Review so you can take the time to learn everything about the firearm before using it. Both these options work effectively when used in this manner, but they should only be used if a person is truly in danger.

Otherwise you get girls who are disproportionately interested in the confirmation by others, especially boys, of their beauty and eventually their sex appeal, often at the expense of their self-esteem — and who are thus ill-equipped to effectively fight back against rape culture. For more convincing of all this, watch Siebel Newsom’s original documentary, Miss Representation, about the uphill battle girls have in our sexist society.

4. Respect kids’ bodily boundaries and teach kids to respect those of others.

This means when you’re playing “Tickle Monster” with your kids and they say “Stop!” then stop, even if they’re laughing and having a good time. Don’t make them hug friends or family members if they don’t want to, even if you’re just trying to get them to do something nice and loving – it sends a mixed message. When you hear little kids or siblings playing/fighting/annoyingly touching each other and one of them says “Stop,” immediately intervene and explain, “They said stop, you’ve got to respect their wishes and stop, even if you’re just playing.” This is the kid version of “No means no.” In fact, explain to them that not only does “no means no,” but if a kid is visibly uncomfortable, saddened or upset at the attention they’re getting without ever saying the word “no,” that still means “no.”

5. Don’t have “the talk,” have many talks from an early age.

Always use the correct terminology for all body parts freely and without embarrassment, so their bodies aren’t mysterious or a source of shame. Don’t let your kids see you hate your own body (even if you secretly do). When they’re little, shower and change in front of them so they know what real bodies look like and learn that they’re nothing to be ashamed of. Let your kids know women usually have periods once a month; if you’re bold enough, you can even change your tampon in front of them, like this writer suggests — hey, this is a perfectly normal (read: not gross) reality for half of the post-pubescent population! Never shame them for personal body exploration; just gently explain that touching themselves is something they can do alone in private. When they ask about how body parts and reproduction work, be as honest and direct as their age will allow.

All of this creates an environment of openness, body positivity, and anatomical knowledge that empowers kids to be less fearful of and more inquisitive about sexuality. They should know they can come to you with any — and we mean any — question (or problem) and you’ll answer them as directly, honestly and compassionately as you can, without giggles or eye-rolling. They should also know they can and should come to you if they ever experience “secret touching” (the more accurate and helpful term for “bad touch”) from a friend, teacher, coach, or family member.

Cory Silverberg has a great series of books that can help facilitate these discussions. What Makes a Baby is great picture book for toddlers and up about how all kinds of families get made. His follow-up, Sex Is a Funny Word, is a wonderfully progressive guide for kids ages 7ish to 10ish (which is where we learned about the preferred term “secret touching”). And we can’t wait for his third book in the series for teens to hit shelves soon! In the meantime, S.E.X.: The All You Need to Know Sexuality Guide to Get You Through Your Teens and College is a good choice.

6. For older kids, teach consent, pleasure, reciprocity, self-knowledge, safety and love.

In her new book, Girls & Sex, Peggy Orenstein writes of typical sex education, “Where is the discussion of girls’ sexual development? When do we talk to girls about desire and pleasure? When do we explain the miraculous nuances of their anatomy? When do we address exploration, self-knowledge? No wonder boys’ physical needs seem inevitable to teens while girls are, at best, optional.”

In other words, the first fingers that ever penetrate a young woman should be her own; masturbation should be encouraged (this one mom bravely wrote about eventually buying her daughter her first vibrator); the clitoris should be as well-understood as the penis; sex should be discussed as a mutual, reciprocal exchange of pleasure, not something given up or taken; trips to Planned Parenthood should be offered; a non-judgmental, no-questions-asked “out” should be on hand from you if ever they find themselves in an uncomfortable or unsafe situation; and consent should be taught as something as natural and automatic a part of any sexual exchange as toothpaste is to toothbrushing. By emphasizing these elements of positive sexuality to teens, we can hopefully avoid raising girls who think casual, unreciprocated oral sex is a great way to score social points (as outlined in Orenstein’s book) and boys like Brock Turner who think they’re entitled to sex any way they can get it, even when it’s with a lifeless, passed-out person.

These are not just topics that can be left up to your local school’s sex-ed classes (though those are important, too – see below); these are topics that need to be talked about regularly by parents with kids. And this is not just a maternal duty; dads need to get involved too, even if it might be especially difficult for them having grown up in a hyper-gendered society themselves where men don’t talk about these touchy-feely things. But kids need to hear men be open and unabashed about the importance of respect for their peers, the realities – both negative and positive – of adolescent and teenage sexuality, and the benefits of loving, sexually reciprocal relationships. Yes, just as girls have strong sexual urges, boys crave romantic love, too (as studies have shown) – but again, our society likes to believe and purport otherwise. Moms and dads can help refute this.

7. Demand comprehensive sex education from your local schools.

Vote for candidates who will fund comprehensive sex education and not abstinence-only programs, which don’t work. Find out what your state laws require. Inquire at your schools what their curricula are. Get involved with other like minded-parents to encourage better, more comprehensive programs. If you must, enlist third-party sex educators to hold private local classes and workshops for kids whose parents approve.

8. Talk to kids critically about pop culture, media and, yes, porn.

Unfortunately, this is where too many kids are getting their sex education these days. When self-objectification is basically a requirement for practically all female pop stars and porn too often depicts unrealistic sex acts that are non-consensual, painful, degrading and/or humiliating to women, kids get a very skewed idea of what good sex can be. It becomes more about performance than pleasure, more about sexiness than sexuality, and more about selfishness than caring reciprocity. While you should monitor and restrict their browsing habits, you won’t be able to keep all less-than-positive depictions of sex away from them, so you’ve got to talk with kids regularly about fantasy verses reality.

9. Teach kids to intervene on their friends’ behalf.

Not only do you want to teach your kids to be responsible for their own behavior (be respectful, be safe, be smart), you want to teach them to be good citizens. That means watching out for their friends, making sure their peers aren’t engaging in risky or dangerous behavior, and intervening when they see a friend either taking advantage of someone or being taken advantage of. Sometimes all it takes is one kid with a little social capital to publicly shame another for sexist, misogynistic, homophobic, violent, immoral and/or criminal behavior to make that behavior decidedly uncool and unacceptable among their peers. Show your older kids the horrifying videos and pics from the Stubenville rape case, in which kids at a party joked about an ongoing sexual assault in real time on social media, or watch The Accused with them, and explain how bystanders’ inaction makes them complicit in a terrible crime.

10. If a sexual assault happens to your child or their friends, be supportive and encourage legal action.

The best things you can do when someone is sexually assaulted is listen to, believe and support them; basically the opposite of this writer’s mother’s negative reaction to her daughter’s college rape. Familiarize yourselves and your older kids with the best course of action following a sexual assault, so they know what to do for themselves or their friends. And while you should never pressure someone to go to the authorities who doesn’t want to, just imagine what would happen if everyone who was sexually assaulted got a rape kit and pressed charges. While the internal self-blaming, the external slut-shaming and the piss-poor record of legit punishment that is so common after sexual assault all discourage reporting, fighting back is effective: as the anti-sexual-violence support site, Rainn.org, says, “No matter the final outcome, reporting increases the likelihood that the perpetrator will face consequences.” Real consequences, in addition to better quality sex ed, can only help prevent future rapes.

Read more:
8 Things You Should Know About Consent on College Campuses

In Defense of Maleficent

Since the sequel to 2014’s “Maleficent” — “Maleficent: Mistress of Evil” — is currently out in theaters, my family just rewatched the first one. Five years ago, “Maleficent,” starring Angelina Jolie, received a green-splat score of 53% on Rotten Tomatoes, with a review by the Chicago Sun Times’ Richard Roeper calling it “plodding and utterly unconvincing.” But the second time around only confirmed my first assessment: “Maleficent” is, in fact, awesome! As with many movies featuring a female lead with a majority of female characters that explore feminist themes, the (mostly male) critics got it wrong.

In the genre of fairy tales, the evil queen/evil step-mother characters are often just born that way — which seems to betray an old-timey prejudice that many women are simply manipulative bitches by nature. But any class on character development in Screenwriting 101 will tell you there should be good reasons why someone becomes “evil.” (Everyone praising “The Joker” proves it.)

Maleficent’s own reason in this reimagined origin story is one common among women — her bodily autonomy and integrity is brutally violated by someone she loves and trusts. It’s basically the fairy tale equivalent of date rape: she’s roofied and then her fairy wings (not delicate and dainty but huge, thick and strong) are hacked off by her first love, a human who — motivated by greed and power — is only thinking about what he wants, what’s good for him, what he believes he is entitled to. The assault literally robs of her of something essential to her well-being. This movie predates #MeToo, but it’s 100% #MeToo.

So what to make of Richard Roeper’s glib dismissal of this plot point?:

Damn those humans! They never respect the boundaries of other cultures in their quest for treasure….Because Stefan is a weak, greedy, power-hungry man, he betrays Maleficent — and that’s when all hell breaks loose.

Historically, patriarchal cultures have not respected the boundaries of minorities, the less powerful, those different from the men in charge — seems legit fair game for cinematic allegory, no? He goes on to write:

Scene by scene, “Maleficent” drains all the drama and tension and romance from the story, in favor of hitting us over the head with teaching moments about how women have to look after one another because men are either power-hungry jerks or empty-headed pretty boys. (I know: If we get another thousand films with that message, it still won’t level the cinematic history playing field. But that shouldn’t be the point of a movie.)

When Roeper writes of all romance being drained from the story, which story is he referring to? The 1959 Disney version in which Aurora and the prince meet for five seconds and fall in love, then Aurora succumbs to the curse and falls asleep, then the prince saves the passive princess by killing the evil queen and kissing Aurora awake? Or perhaps he’s referring to the original version from the mid-17th-century in which a married king stumbles upon a dead but not-decomposing Sleeping Beauty, rapes and impregnates her, goes back for more rape only to discover she’s given birth and woken up (in that order), brings her back to the castle where his wife, the queen, tries to cook the kids and feed them to her king (funky cold Medea style) and then tries to throw Sleeping Beauty in a bonfire only to be thrown into the fire and killed by the king first!

The mid-century Disney version — damsel in distress saved by a prince — couldn’t be more tired. The original version — necrophilia, rape, adultery, cannibalism, murder — couldn’t be more horrifying. At least with 2014’s “Maleficent,” we do get something truly new and positive:

  • Women do need to look out for one another, so why isn’t that good enough to be the point of a movie? Oh, that’s right: because women’s issues have historically been seen as losers for Hollywood big business (i.e. too much of a bummer for dudes). But thanks to work being done by institutions like The Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media, the tides are finally — albeit slowly — turning!
  • How novel that (spoiler alert) the “true love’s kiss” by the prince doesn’t work here because, duh, they only just met — they don’t know each other, they can’t really be in love, at least not yet, because true romantic love and intimacy take time, communication and understanding.
  • How refreshing that the true love’s kiss that does work is from Maleficent herself. The movie makes maternal love the star of the film — and not even biological maternal love, but adoptive maternal love — perhaps the most selfless love of all.
  • And how uplifting that when Maleficent gets her wings back — when she is healed — she finally gets the upper hand over her abuser and can fly freely again.

Yes, you should probably have a talk with your kids about its lack of diversity and the problem of the young prince kissing Aurora square on the mouth while she’s sleeping, i.e. without her consent. But otherwise, “Maleficent” is a wonderful, female-driven movie for the whole family (girls, boys and everyone in between — okay, maybe not the little ones), with plenty of impressive CGI battle scenes interspersed with the humanization of a complicated three-dimensional character. A breath of fresh air from the almighty Marvel Universe, it’s a movie that prizes the power of familial love over superhuman strength. Why that uncommon message was praised in 2013’s “Frozen” (a movie that basically condones boys eating boogers) but not in 2014’s “Maleficent” is beyond me.

The Maleficent sequel gets a 41% on Rotten Tomatoes. I haven’t seen it yet, so I’ll take that rating with a grain of salt for now.

Nipplegate 2: Adam Levine’s Shirtless Superbowl Halftime Performance

There were audible groans among the crowd — especially from the hetero dads — at my friend’s Super Bowl LII party when Maroon 5’s frontman Adam Levine took off his shirt towards the end of their half-time show and spawned Nipplegate 2. The consensus seemed to be that this was not only cheesy, but inappropriate.

Levine spent much of the performance making bedroom eyes at the camera, gradually removing layers of clothing — first a long jacket, then a tracksuit top, and finally his tight-fitting tank top — to reveal chiseled abs, extensive tattoo art, and two — count ‘em two — nipples. One of his patented moves was a subtle but unmistakable slinky hip roll reminiscent of sensual pelvic thrusting. He wasn’t just working hard singing and dancing and eventually getting sweaty and overheated — this was deliberate, choreographed self-objectification and -sexualization.

“It gave everyone the ickies,” one mom friend told me (there were plenty of kids watching the show). “The shirtless bit just does not work for me or my 7-year-old fan daughter. She says he is still her favorite, but that was just gross.”

I have to admit: I kind of loved it.

Don’t get me wrong. In an ideal world, the Super Bowl Halftime show would be a family-friendly spectacle of musical prowess and impressive pyrotechnics, with no sexual over- or undertones. And after the original Nipplegate in 2004 — when Justin Timberlake accidentally ripped off too much of Janet Jackson’s top to reveal a decorated nipple (a sin for which Jackson, and Jackson alone, beared all of the blame and punishment) — the halftime show became just that for several years, with straightforward rock performances by the likes of Paul McCartney, the Rolling Stones, Prince, Tom Petty, Bruce Springsteen, and The Who. (Perhaps it wasn’t just Jackson, but all of female rockdom who had to be punished for Nipplegate.)

But eventually the sexiness came creeping back in. Namely in the form of female pop stars in their underwear: Beyonce in 2013 in black leather and lace, Katy Perry in 2015 in a short skirt alongside bathing-suit-clad female dancers, Beyonce again in 2016 in a soldier leotard, and Lady Gaga in 2017 in not one one, but two different versions of bedazzled panties. To be sure, these were all super talented, musical powerhouses at zeniths in their careers giving impressive performances. But they were singing songs about lust, making sexy eyes at the camera, gyrating suggestively, and showing a lot of skin. So where was the outrage over inappropriateness then?

Female sexualization is so ingrained in our cultural psyche as the absolute norm — indeed, the requirement — for successful female celebrities. Fit female bodies are, apparently, the only form to be publicly admired and consumed. For Americans, there’s something decidedly feminine about sexual objectification. So when a man does it, especially a straight man, he’s derided for it.

Levine’s actually weren’t the first male nipples to make an appearance at the Super Bowl since Jackson’s wardrobe malfunction. In 2014, during Bruno Mars’ headliner halftime performance, the Red Hot Chili Peppers made a supporting appearance, with both vocalist Anthony Kiedis and bassist Flea totally shirtless. But they wore their nips with a difference: they didn’t strip, they didn’t make googoo eyes, they simply thrashed about the stage like aggressive adderall-fueled jumping beans at a punk show — not what many would consider typically “sexy” (even though Keidis was singing the lyrics “What I’ve got you’ve got to get it put it in you”).

There were a handful of complaints in 2014 about inappropriateness and double standards, but not as many as Levine has received in the day after. And I’d argue that’s mostly because Levine, a straight dude, committed the unforgivable sin of acting like a woman. Clutching your pearls when Levine does it, but not when Beyonce, Perry or Gaga do it, reveals some deep-seated sexism, homophobia and good-old fashioned American Puritanism.

Which, again, is not to say I want the Super Bowl Halftime Show to become one big striptease going forward, no matter the gender of the artists. For a communal family event like the Super Bowl, I say keep the sex out of it altogether (especially when we as a country don’t offer our kids decent, comprehensive sex education to be able to process sexual imagery critically). But what I found so refreshing last night was the fact that there wasn’t a single woman on stage either playing the oversexed sidekick clawing at Levine’s thighs or the supporting female guest star who’s equal in talent but not in amount of clothing. The only sexual objectification that happened on stage happened to a man for once.

I imagine Levine’s actions were not motivated by much more than his vanity. But perhaps the kind of role reversal he engaged in on such huge national level will actually do some social good. It’s not about how Levine should be punished for showing his nipples, but how Jackson should definitely not have been. His sexy reveal laid bare (ahem) just how bad the double standards are for women, especially black women — the bars are higher, the judgements are swifter, the consequences are harsher. And perhaps the discomfort so many straight, sports-loving guys felt as they watched Levine do exactly what so many female stars feel compelled to do will make them think twice about encouraging and accepting every-day, casual female objectification. At the very least, it might give them a taste of what it’s like to be subjected to the same unrealistic bodily beauty standards women have been held to for decades!

After the performance ended and I was pretty much the only one clapping with glee, my husband later said, “You know, two wrongs don’t make a right.” But if sexual objectification is going to exist in pop culture — and of course it always will — then I’d much prefer that objectification be equal-opportunity instead of one-sided.  Evening the playing field in this regard might result in more restraint and less sexism (which sounds like an award-winning Super Bowl commercial tagline for a good light beer).

“Hey,” I said to my husband, “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander!”

A question for the upcoming Oscars:
Why Differentiate Between Best Actor & Actress?

Fuck Mistletoe

Thanks to the #MeToo Movement, it’s become clear it’s high time to get rid of some long-standing traditions: sexual predation by men in power, friends and colleagues who turn a blind eye to — or worse, enable — misconduct, useless H.R. departments, answering the door in a robe, secret under-the-desk buttons that lock the office door, not-so-stealth over-the-phone masturbation sessions with guileless colleagues, forced foot rubs, pussy grabbing, mall solicitation of tweens, child molestation, roofies, date rape, stranger rape, and, oh yeah, fucking mistletoe.

First, did you know mistletoe is a conniving parasitic plant that attaches to an unsuspecting tree or shrub, viciously sucking the life-force from its host without consent? Its berries are also toxic, causing serious health problems to those who ingest it. So, mistletoe is basically the Harvey Weinstein of plant-based holiday decorations!

People in the Middle Ages thought mistletoe helped with fertility and vitality. You know what else people in the Dark Ages believed?  That boar bile enemas were good for you and regular bloodletting via leeches was a smart way to stay healthy. Some traditions should be happily abandoned. Thank you, Science.

According to Wikipedia, the custom of kissing under mistletoe dates back to late 18th century England, but really picked up steam as an adorable little tool of Christmas-time sexual harassment and shaming with 19th-century Victorian men, who agreed to the following rules: any (old, fat, pock-faced, Scrooge-breathed) dude was allowed to kiss any woman standing underneath the mistletoe and, conveniently, bad luck would surely befall her should she have the audacity to reject his wet fish lips and probing Frankentongue. In some cases, the only way to get the forced face sucking to stop was to pick a berry off for every “kiss” until the branch was bare. (Apparently, a swift kick to the nuts wasn’t considered very lady like in Victorian England — and still isn’t today in most “civilized” circles.)

The clever (read: evil) placement of mistletoe over the door, often the only entrance or exit to a room, has given creepers over the last century the chance to plan their pouncing on unsuspecting women. Women who are just looking to get from one place to another without the threat of sexual sucker-punches. Women who are trained to be polite and accommodating and sensitive to delicate egos, who don’t want to rock the boat, cause a scene, or risk losing their jobs. Oh look, there’s Bill, the Head of Accounting, mischievously pointing up at the little berry-strewn branch tied neatly overhead with a festive red bow — kill me now! Mistletoe is the PG-version of Louis CK blocking the door with his dick in his hand.

Martha Stewart, get on board: it’s time to ditch mistletoe as a staple of holiday decoration. If we could count on a sweeping societal rewrite of the mistletoe tradition, then we could keep it around as just a harmless excuse for long-term couples to consensually engage in a little exhibitionistic PDA during the holidays to invigorate their sagging libidos. But as long as there are apologists (we’re looking at you Matt Damon, Bill from Accounting, and everyone’s creepy step-uncle) who claim this is just a little frisky fun for people who can take a joke, then fuck mistletoe.

Stick with a nice poinsettia instead.

For more on shitty sexual predatation:

Is What Louis CK Did Rape?

The Power and Pitfalls of Consent (Louis CK Part II)

The Weinsteins of the World Get Permission in a Million Little Ways Every Day

10 Easy Ways Not to Be a Misogynist Pig Like Trump

Happy Intersex Awareness Day!

One of my kids has red hair. So when I discovered the upper estimate of the population born with intersex traits is 1.7% — similar to the number of red-haired people in the world — it really hit home how common intersexuality is. You certainly know — or at the very least have met — intersex people, whether you realize it or not. Maybe you are intersex yourself! According to The Intersex Society of North America (ISNA), some people live and die with intersex anatomy without anyone — including themselves — ever knowing.

That’s because “intersex” is an umbrella term that encompasses a vast array of possible natural variations in the development of sex characteristics (genitals, gonads and/or chromosomal patterns) that do not fit typical binary notions of male or female bodies. For example, a person might be born appearing to be female on the outside, but has mostly male-typical anatomy on the inside. Or someone may be born with genitals that seem to be in-between what’s typically considered male and female. Or one may be born with mosaic genetics, wherein some of their cells have XY chromosomes and some of them have XX. (Keep in mind, these biological sex characteristics are distinct from a person’s gender identity or sexual orientation; an intersex person may identify as female, male, both or neither, and may be straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual, pansexual or asexual.)

ISNA likens this sex characteristics spectrum to the color spectrum:

There’s no question that in nature there are different wavelengths that translate into colors most of us see as red, blue, orange, yellow. But the decision to distinguish, say, between orange and red-orange is made only when we need it — like when we’re asking for a particular paint color. Sometimes social necessity leads us to make color distinctions that otherwise would seem incorrect or irrational, as, for instance, when we call certain people “black” or “white” when they’re not especially black or white as we would otherwise use the terms.

In the same way, nature presents us with sex anatomy spectrums. Breasts, penises, clitorises, scrotums, labia, gonads—all of these vary in size and shape and morphology. So-called “sex” chromosomes can vary quite a bit, too. But in human cultures, sex categories get simplified into male, female, and sometimes intersex, in order to simplify social interactions, express what we know and feel, and maintain order.

So nature doesn’t decide where the category of “male” ends and the category of “intersex” begins, or where the category of “intersex” ends and the category of “female” begins. Humans decide.

Unfortunately, that has meant that, historically, many binary-minded doctors and parents of intersex kids have insisted on medically unnecessary “normalizing” surgeries which attempt (and often fail) to force children — without their educated consent — into one of two neat little boxes: either “male” or “female.” Watch the “Intersex” episode of Buzzfeed’s “Follow This” series on Netflix for heartbreaking examples of this. Or read the following description by a writer for the Intersex Network of what it can be like to be intersex in a binary world:

We are assigned male or female despite our sex being unknown. We are encouraged and oftentimes forced into gender roles of man and woman. We are surgically altered so that as a man we have as few female features as possible and as a woman we have as few male features as possible. We are thought to be mentally ill if we reject our gender role and sex assignment. We are offered no respite from the sex or gender binary expectations of society. There are no provisions for behaviors other than man or woman and no sexs other than male or female for us to live out. There is a constant social pressure for us to see ourselves as having a stake in the binary despite undeniable biological evidence to the contrary.

In short, our differences are the subject of constant erasure by a society that harbors a deep homophobic fear, even hatred, of our biology. We are the subject of constant medical experimentation that has the primary aim of eliminating our differences from the ways it is possible to be human.

Fortunately, intersex rights activists and sex educators have made great strides in discouraging the medical community (and parents of intersex kids) from such kneejerk procedures while educating them on the specific healthcare needs and basic human rights of the intersex community. The United Nations’ “Free & Equal” campaign has a great list of action points for promoting intersexuality rights (see page 2). And IntersexDay.com has many articles on the topic from an array of voices to further educate yourself.

 

Celebrate International Women’s Day Every Day:
7 Ways to Achieve Sexual Equality

Kavanaugh Is a Teachable Moment

These days, you hear a lot of parents bemoan the fact that they can’t have the news on, for fear their kids might hear something sexually inappropriate. That “America’s Dad” Bill Cosby drugged and sexually assaulted 60 women. That the Catholic Church has been a child-rape factory and cover-up machine for decades.  That our own president, accused by several women of sexual misconduct, has admitted to grabbing women “by the pussy” without their consent. And that yet another conservative candidate for a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court — where he will potentially make judgments about laws that affect women’s bodies and health and safety — has been accused of a serious sexual crime. Not just gross sexual harassment as in the case of Justice Clarence “Pubic Hair on My Coke Can” Thomas (which is awful enough), but actual sexual assault. It’s the case of Judge Brett “What Happens at Georgetown Prep Stays at Georgetown Prep” Kavanaugh.

I have a ten year old daughter. She’s on a serious panda kick right now — we’re talking homemade panda wall decorations, a panda comforter, a panda charm. She’s finishing the last Harry Potter book and is a huge Emma Watson fan. She still likes to cuddle and still says, in the sweetest voice that turns me into a puddle, “I love you, Mommy.” But she also just started middle school. Just about everyone at her school is going through puberty. Some of them are already “dating” (whatever that means), some for a couple of years already. At least one 6th grader wears high heels to school every day.  Whether I like it or not — and I don’t: please stay little! — my kid is growing up.

So when she came came into the kitchen the other day when the details of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations against Brett Kavanaugh were being broadcast on the news, rather than rushing to turn it off, I paused it, set up the situation for her, and then let her listen to the report. When it concluded, I turned it off and tried to convey the following to her, in the most straightforward way possible, while I continued to make veggie quesadillas for dinner:

There are some people in the world who will try to force themselves on others. These people are usually boys or men (which doesn’t mean all boys or men are like this). But these particular people will use physical force or threats or emotional pressure to take what they want and feel they deserve sexually from someone. This is sexual violence, sexual abuse, and is often called sexual assault. This happens. Way too often. It may happen someday to someone you know. I hope it never happens to you. But you need to be aware of it.

Often times survivors of sexual assault don’t tell anyone, for a variety of reasons: they feel guilty, like they did something to cause it to happen; they feel embarrassed and ashamed and don’t want anyone to know; they worry no one will believe them, like the way all the Republican Congressmen seem to not believe Dr. Ford. But — and this is important — people this happens to have nothing to feel guilty or embarrassed about. They did nothing wrong. They need to speak up and tell someone they trust as soon as it happens so that they can get the help they need. And so hopefully the person who committed this crime can be held accountable, so it never happens again to anybody else.

Do you have any questions you want to ask me?

She didn’t. But I imagine that’s because I’m a sex educator who has these type of conversations with my kids often. Okay Mom, I get it. You tell us this stuff all the time is a common response, usually followed by a dramatic sigh and a roll of the eyes and Can we pleeeeeaaaaaase turn Ariana Grande back on now? We don’t have The Talk; we have ongoing, age-appropriate discussions about bodies and consent and sexuality so they realize these topics are not “icky” or taboo or shameful.

This was the first discussion that was current event–based.  And perhaps the scariest — for both of us. Some might say it was not age-appropriate, considering the details of Dr. Ford’s allegations. But guess what? Ten year olds get sexually assaulted, just as teenagers and adults do. Not talking about that reality is what has kept so many crimes in the shadows. It’s what predators rely on: our society’s squeamishness over talking openly and honestly about, not just sexual violence, but sex in general. I don’t want my kids to be scared, but I don’t want them to be naive either. I want them to have the tools to navigate the tough stuff, if ever the need should arise. And if #MeToo is any indication, it will arise — inevitably.

Unpacking rape culture:
The Weinsteins of the World Get Permission in a Million Little Ways Every Day

Take the Long Way Home to Your Orgasm

Most people have that one, fail-safe way that gets them from point A to point O quickly and directly, scenic lookout points be damned! And when you’re busy or tired (read: every minute of every day), it’s easy (and understandable) to resort to that surefire orgasm route on the rare occasion you do get around to doing it.

But the next time you have a bit of down time (make the time if you have to), whether you’re alone or with a partner, give yourself at least 30 minutes — okay, 20 — to try to climax in a different way.

Because the more ways you can train your body to have an orgasm, the less chance your orgasm has of ever getting old, and the better chance you have of achieving orgasm under any positive circumstances.  Yes, having the same-old same-old orgasm may be a first world problem, but it’s one that is definitely fun to try to solve.

Here are some suggestions for how:

But don’t worry if you haven’t gotten to O-town before your “allotted” time’s up. Here, we’re reminded of some great dialogue from an obscure, deep-deep 80s movie, one of Jennifer Connelly’s first — Seven Minutes in Heaven — in which orgasm is described as exquisite relief from torture. Why torture? Because it’s it’s real torture not to have the orgasm. So why torture yourself? Because it feels so good to almost have it.

See? The journey is 90% of the fun!

This post has been updated. 

Why All Women Should Masturbate
(Even When They’re in a Relationship)

When It Comes to Restrictions on Reproductive Rights, WOMEN Are the Problem

In the United States, it took 131 years for women to get the right to vote, 133 years to get our first female Senator, 192 years to get a woman on the Supreme Court, and we’re still waiting — a whopping 229 years — for our first female president. Like much of the world, our country has a long history of female subjugation by men in power. Historically, much of that control has been exerted sexually — for example, via strict marital expectations, rape, lack of birth control, and anti-abortion laws.

Today, thankfully, women are free to live and work without marrying, or to marry a fellow female; marital rape is now illegal in all 50 states (only since 1993); thanks to rape shield laws and Title IX, we can better fight sexual crimes; the Pill gave women control over their reproductive destinies; today any gal can walk into a CVS and buy condoms; and hallelujah for Roe v. Wade!

When we think of efforts to roll back the clock on all this progress, we tend to think of sexist, misogynistic, homophobic men who are afraid of women’s sexual power (i.e. Trump-Pence types), who long for the good ol’ days when women knew their place: barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen. Which is why the results of the recent NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll are so surprising.

According to an analysis by NPR’s Domenico Montanaro:

The group most ardently in support of outright overturning Roe, according to the poll, is Republican women, who often fuel anti-abortion-rights activism. More than 4 in 10 (43 percent) of Republican women want Roe overturned. Another 36 percent of Republican women want restrictions added to abortion rights.

A majority of Republican women want to restrict or eliminate access to a safe, medical procedure that is key to women’s autonomy. They want to enact legislation that wouldn’t actually stop abortions but just create a whole new set of social woes for themselves and their sisters. As Michelle Oberman, author of Her Body, Our Laws: On the Front Lines of the Abortion War, From El Salvador to Oklahoma,” wrote in the New York Times recently:

…it’s clear that even a substantial legal victory for abortion opponents will not be as effective in combating abortion as they imagine — not just because a woman who wants to terminate her pregnancy will find a way, but also because abortion drugs make finding that way easier than ever…. But there will still be consequences. Doctors will find themselves torn between norms protecting confidentiality and the pressure to report their patients [for suspected induced miscarriages]; the pressure to treat women themselves as criminals is likely to grow, intensifying an existing pattern of charging poor minority women with crimes arising from miscarriages, stillbirths or perceived risks taken while pregnant.

Remember which demographic was a key deciding factor — besides Russians — in electing a serial sexual predator and adulterer to the highest office in the country, if not the world? White WOMEN. Fifty-three percent of all white women who voted in the presidential election voted for Trump.

It all seems counter-intuitive: Why are women, especially Republican women, acting and voting in ways that are against their own best interests? Is it purely out of strict adherence to religious dogma that embraces traditional gender roles and contends that human “souls” enter the egg at fertilization? Or could it be, at least in part, something more sinister? Some toxic combination of judmentalism, self-hatred, lack of education, and erotophobia, perhaps? It’s like political Stockholm Syndrome!

Whatever the case may be, those of us who understand that bodily autonomy is key to the success and equality of women in the modern, civilized world need to do a better job of conveying our long history of sexist oppression to these misguided female voters, so that we stop coming closer and closer to repeating it.

Why Trump, America’s Abusive Boyfriend,
Won the Election

Further Reading:
Reproductive Rights Are Human Rights

The Difference Between Kink and Abuse

Are there no decent men in the world? NY Attorney General Eric Schneiderman was supposed to be one of the good ones, a champion of the #MeToo Movement who was going after alleged serial sexual assaulter and rapist, Harvey Weinstein. But then The New Yorker (which might seriously need to consider changing its name to “To Catch a Predator Weekly”) revealed that four women have accused him of sexual, physical and emotional abuse, which involved things like non-consensual choking, verbal humiliation, and hitting to the point of causing unintentional long-term damage. (If you haven’t read the details, please do — they’re bone-chilling.)

Assuming these allegations are true — and considering the overlapping details of some of the women who didn’t even know each other, combined with the well-established journalistic vigor of The New Yorker, why wouldn’t you? — some clarifications should be made for the sake of sexual education and understanding.

Eric Schneiderman is not a monster because he liked to roleplay, or because he liked rough sex, or because his dirty talk included phrases like “you’re a dirty little slut,” or even because he might be a sexual sadist who gets off on inflicting pain. Eric Schneiderman is a monster because he never got enthusiastic consent from his partners to engage in those activities.

When you find a partner who enjoys all the above (and there are plenty of submissives, bottoms and/or masochists who do) and said partner engages in them willingly, thoughtfully and happily with jointly negotiated boundaries and a predetermined safeword, then you are just a responsible member of the kink community. When you force these kinds of things on an unwitting and unwilling partner with zero communication or negotiation, then you are a domestic abuser and a sexual assaulter.

I’m currently enrolled in the Institute for Sexuality Education and Enlightenment (in order to become a certified sex educator) and was recently invited by two fellow classmates — both in the Portland, Oregon kink community — to attend a “munch” (a social gathering of kinksters in a public space with no sexual playing).  I went and was delighted to hear an astute lecture given to the packed house by a particularly eloquent, sadistic edge-player (look it up) who addressed all the following with charm and wit:

  • The importance of deliberate negotiation between any set of partners
  • How a lack of communication contributes to rape culture
  • The necessary willingness one must posses to face rejection when your sexual proclivities don’t align with someone else’s
  • The feminist instinct to trust individual women’s professed desires, no matter how tame or extreme
  • And the paramountcy of consent in kink and vanilla sex

He was so intellectually spot on, that he made his desire to find a partner willing to let him kidnap her and bury her alive in a box with an air-tube and a camera so he could watch from the comfort of his home sound (almost) reasonable!

The point is, there’s a right way to do kink and a wrong way. When you’re a straight guy like Schneiderman, the wrong way means what you’re doing is actually not kink (or “roleplaying” as he claimed in a statement); it’s criminal abuse stemming either from a misogynistic belief that you’re entitled to control and dominate women’s minds and bodies without their permission, or from severe mental illness. There’s probably some overlap between those two.

A lot of people — mostly straight, “vanilla” men — have rued the “excesses” of the #MeToo movement, wondering how they’re supposed to be expected to operate romantically in a world where the concept of giving and getting enthusiastic consent is becoming the ideal. “What am I supposed to do, ask permission every time I want to go in for a kiss? That’s not sexy!” To those people, I would say: if you ever get the chance, watch a top and a bottom negotiate a scene.

I got that opportunity in one of my certification courses: my two classmates from the kink community agreed, upon our teacher’s request, to conduct a sample negotiation in front of the class. They sat side by side, fully clothed. The dominant got out his phone and pulled up a long list of questions. In a soothing voice, he began to slowly and methodically pose each one to her: Can I kiss you? How do you feel about nudity? What about pain play? Genital touching? Above or below the clothes? What body parts may I tie up, if any? . . . 

The list went on and on. She answered each one honestly and clearly with complete agency.  It was a symbiotic, egalitarian exchange of mutual respect and responsibility. The class was absolutely rapt. And the process was undeniably, extraordinarily sexy.

No matter what kind of sex we happen to enjoy — whether our idea of a fun Saturday night is doing it missionary style with the lights off OR going to a sex club to suck the strap-on of a stranger in a corset while our partner watches — we could learn a lot from the BDSM community’s dedication to responsible communication and consent. The case of Eric Schneiderman is a lesson in what not to do.

More kink done wrong:
10 Things We Won’t Miss from the Fifty Shades Franchise

Sex Is Life-Affirming Freedom in “The Handmaid’s Tale” 
[spoiler alert!]

When the state controls your body, sex is rape. The “ceremony” scenes in Season 1 of “The Handmaid’s Tale” on Hulu (based on the 1985 seemingly evergreen novel of the same name by Margaret Atwood) made that clear: when a fertile handmaid’s male “master” penetrates her in the presence of his infertile wife, there is no consent, no pleasure, no contraception, no choice.

Season 2, which premiered last night (praise be!) and picks up where the book left off, continues its tradition of pre-revolution flashbacks which reveal just how the United States went from modern democracy to misogynistic Christian theonomy in the blink of an eye. Pre-fall, we see protagonist June Osborne — a full-time professional with a husband and a young daughter — ask her spouse to sign her birth control renewal form: “There’s a line for the husband’s signature now.” In a loving and somewhat amorous exchange, the two decide together not to refill her prescription in the hopes of having another kid — a sharp contrast to the brutal world awaiting them just around the corner.

It’s this kind of insidious chip-chip-chipping away of women’s sexual and reproductive rights in “The Handmaid’s Tale” that so eerily reflects our own Trumpian dystopia. In his first year as president, according to the Guardian, Trump:

  • rescinded the Obamacare requirement that employers provide contraception coverage
  • rolled back a rule introduced by Obama to close the gender pay gap
  • reinstated the “global gag rule” that restricts the US from funding international family planning orgs that provide abortion-related services
  • said he wants to defund Planned Parenthood
  • signed Republican-passed legislation that enabled state & local govs to block federal funds to abortion clinics
  • banned the CDC from using the words “fetus,” “transgender” and “science-based” in its budget docs
  • filled federal courts with conservative white males, include Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch who could help overturn Roe v. Wade
  • appointed Scott Lloyd to head the Office of Refugee Resettlement, who tried to prevent a pregnant teenage undocumented immigrant from obtaining an abortion
  • has not had to answer to the myriad accusations of sexual assault made against him

And according to Mashable, he also:

  • reversed on-campus sexual assault guidelines
  • disbanded the White House Council on Women and Girls
  • pulled back federal protections for transgender students
  • reversed a law that guaranteed sexual assault victims their day in court

Apparently, we’ve got our own Gilead on the horizon — let’s not wait until Trump requires our husband’s approval to get our Pill refills! Because once they get those ear tags on, getting them off — as June makes painfully clear in the premiere of season 2 — is a real bitch.

Grassroots activism to increase votes for progressive values is the number one priority for preserving women’s rights in our world. But if the personal is political, then there are other fun ways you can also contribute to the cause: namely, by making like the newly liberated June and having the kind of sex you want and deserve.

While on the run, hiding out in the abandoned offices of The Boston Globe (the site, she discovers, of mass executions), June reunites with her household’s chauffeur, Nick, the man she was forced by her mistress to have intercourse with in order to compensate for the master’s infertility. June and Nick carried on rendezvousing in secret in Season 1, holding their own mini-counter-revolution of two above the garage. But back then, June was still a handmaid. Now, she’s a fugitive, out from under the red cloak and the white wings (and the ear tag!).

Filled with feminist rage and an insatiable lust for freedom, June takes the initiative, grabs Nick by the hair, gets rough with his junk, and has animalistic intercourse with nary a conservative care for their fetus — standing up against the wall, getting it from behind, her on top — again and again until they’re covered in sweat and he is spent. “I can’t,” he says. But filled with a hunger to live and to express that vitality through sex, she insists, “Try.

For such a feminist powerhouse of a tv show, the sex scene last night was pretty focused on the almighty peen — no cunnilingus, no orgasms for her by any means necessary, no masturbation — acts that would be the embodiment of female empowerment. But perhaps the producers were hoping intercourse would be a metaphor for making love in a world so filled with hate, in a D.H. Lawrence kind of way. (A pro-sex feminist can dream.)

Whatever the case, the main takeaway was that powerful women can and should initiate sex, enjoy sex, be unabashed about a libido bigger than his (if and when that happens to be the case), and be unafraid to ask for what they want. Maybe making that kind of love will help us keep the red capes at bay with a blue wave this November.

If you like “The Handmaid’s Tale,”
You’ll Love “The Power”

Vagina vs. Vulva — There’s a Difference, People

A while back we here at EMandLO.com conducted a poll called “Vulva or Vagina?” Readers had two options to choose from (natch):

  • Vulva – If we’re talking about female external genitalia, this is the anatomically correct & accurate term. (Plus, it sounds nicer.)
  • Vagina – That’s what EVERYONE calls it. It’s common practice, common knowledge. Nobody calls it vulva. To do so is pretentious.

I knew it would be a close race, but I had faith that the forward thinking, sexually enlightened (or at least sexually curious) readers we are lucky enough to attract would do the right thing, make the right choice.

I was wrong. [Melodramatic pause.]

Originally, “Vagina” received 60% of the votes; “Vulva” only 40%. Today, it’s gotten only a smidge better:

What happened? In trying to avoid leading the witnesses by making the vulva option too appealing (thereby revealing our preference), did I overcompensate and accidentally make the vagina option too convincing, relatively speaking? Did I inadvertently suggest to readers that if they voted for “vulva,” that meant they were automatically pretentious, thereby ensuring that a majority of hip, down-to-earth, unstuffy readers would choose “vagina”? Or did they just genuinely feel this way?

Those decidedly in the vagina camp usually share the views of those expressed in articles like “I Don’t Care About Your Stupid Vulva, It’s All Vagina to Me“: “All of our [lady] parts deserve attention, respect, and care—our vaginas, our vulvas, our clitorises, our labia….But that doesn’t mean it’s disrespectful to use a catch-all shortcut when I need to refer to all of those beautiful miracles at once.” The anti-vulvers usually argue:

  1. “Vagina” is funnier, more confrontational and more exciting than “vulva” — key for an entertainment writer who is not an anatomy textbook writer.
  2. “Vagina” has linguistically evolved to mean all lady parts.
  3. “WHOOOOO CAAAAAARES?”

Then they usually conclude by disrespecting all the gentle defenders of correct terminology with a bunch of so-mature name-calling.

[Deep breath.] Who cares? Really? Well, if the number of people who profess to want gender equality, bodily integrity, and sexual agency  is any indication, then the answer is — or at least should be — a whole hell of a lot.

If the pro-vadges argued in favor of using a fun, funny, catch-all nickname for the general female genital area (both inside and out), I’d be all for it. In her book “How to Be a Woman,” British writer Caitlin Moran expounds on the tricky business of nicknaming one’s vagina. Moran — who, ironically but not surprisingly, conflates the two things, using “vagina” for both the birth canal and the external vulva — prefers the term “cunt.” Now there’s a word that’s truly confrontational! She writes:

If I tell you what I’ve got down there, old ladies and clerics might faint. I like how shocked people are when you say “cunt.” It’s like I have a nuclear bomb in my underpants or a mad tiger, or a gun.

Even though Moran hates on the word “vagina” and therefore inadvertently ends up kind of self-hating, she takes what’s often considered the grandmammy of female slurs, flipps it around, and uses it for her own personal and sexual empowerment! And because it’s slang — unlike the clinical, anatomically correct word “vagina” — “cunt” has the fluidity to encompass all lady parts, much like many other fun nicknames could too.

The average vagina-as-catchall defender may not be writing anatomy textbooks, but they can’t escape the fact that vagina is an anatomical term, with a specific definition — one that is not going to change any time soon. And it shouldn’t change: it is what it is. Nobody would consider trying to change the meaning of “penis” to encompass the testicles because 1) everybody is well educated (and unconflicted) about the anatomy of dudes, and 2) they mean two distinctly different things! When you visit your gynecologist, saying you have vuvlar pain does not mean you have deep, internal vaginal pain. And anatomical literacy can be helpful not only in terms of your health, but in terms of your sex life!

Words matter. They influence people’s — especially young people’s — ideas about the world, ideas that can shape the way people treat each other, ideas that can affect the way we think about our bodies, ourselves.

To further explain why getting it wrong matters, I turn to Joyce McFadden, psychologist, researcher and author of the book Your Daughter’s Bedroom: Insights for Raising Confident Women, who wrote the following in an article called “How Do We Influence the Women Our Daughters Become?“:

If our little girls are raised to believe that boys have a penis but girls have a “down there,” we need to understand these girls will likely grow into women who, even in the new millennium, confuse their vulvas with their vaginas. Along the way, they’ll be at risk of seeing their bodies as the property of boys because they haven’t been supported in developing a sense of ownership over their own bodies, and this will put them at risk of unintended pregnancy as well as make them more susceptible to not knowing how to advocate for their safety in potentially dangerous situations. And ultimately, they’re more likely to end up in long-term relationships or marriages in which they’re sexually unhappy.

McFadden interviewed hundreds of women for her project, and she was shocked to discover how so many adult women didn’t even know the word “vulva,” let alone what it meant. And in her studies, she found that this kind of ignorance led to feeling uncomfortable about female sexual issues, which meant their kids grew up feeling uncomfortable about them, too.

A professor of sexology (I can’t remember who) once said in an interview: “Imagine how the world would be different if people were told, starting from a very young age, that the female equivalent of the penis was the clitoris.” (And it’s true: anatomically speaking, the penis is just an overgrown clit.) Chances are, women would be more fully accepted as active, sexual creatures with their own physical desires, rather than widely thought of as passive objects of desire for hetero men.

As my daughter has grown up, I’ve taught her that she has a nose, not a honker. She has eyes, not peepers. When she goes to the bathroom, she wipes her vulva. The hole her poop comes out of is an anus. She knows that I get a period, that all grown women do, and that’s it’s natural and normal. Her younger brother knows, too.

When my daughter asked what that little nubbin of hers was when she was two or three, I told her: it’s a clitoris. I was horrified to learn that when Em’s daughter first asked her the same question, Em initially panicked and called it a “twinkle.” I’m happy to report that, after seeing McFadden speak in person, she’s come over to anatomically correct camp.

Our daughters may eventually be ashamed of us, but if we have anything to do with it, they will not be ashamed of their bodies — vulvas, vaginas and all!

RELATED LINKS FROM EMandLO.com:

Best Actor, Best Actress — Why Differentiate?

A 1995 study called “The Role of Classification Skill in Moderating Environmental Influences on Children’s Gender Stereotyping” showed that the simple organizational technique of separating kids by gender in elementary school classrooms has a profound effect on the way those kids think about gender. In her excellent book, Parenting Beyond Pink and Blue: How to Raise Your Kids Free of Gender Stereotypes, developmental psychologist Dr. Christia Spears Brown explains:

Early in her career, [Rebecca Bigler, a professor of developmental psychology at the University of Texas at Austin] conducted an experiment with a group of elementary school teachers and their students. Half of the teachers were told to use gender to label, sort, and organize the classroom. They had a pink bulletin board for girls and a blue one for boys, each child’s name card was written in either pink or blue, and children always lined up boy-girl-boy-girl. The teachers would say “The girls are doing a great job today” or “The boys are being good listeners.”

One important part of this experiment, though, was that teachers had to treat boys and girls equally. If boys were allowed to pass out the scissors, girls had to be allowed to pass out the glue—no favoritism or competition allowed! They also couldn’t express any stereotypes. Boys were never asked to be “big and strong” and lift the desks; girls were never asked to sweep the floors. They simply had to “use gender” to sort, label, and classify. In other words, it was a typical, ordinary classroom. In comparison, the other half of the teachers ignored the gender of their students. They used individual names when referring to children and treated the classroom as a whole. There were no “What a smart girl” comments or “I need the boys to settle down” requests. Instead, they said, “Lauren, you are being a great helper” or “What a good learner you are!”

You know what happened: the kids in the gender-focused classes ended up holding much stronger gender stereotypes than those in the individual-focused classes. If only 4 weeks of this approach in a grade-school classroom can have such a narrowing effect on people’s assumptions about gender, imagine what a lifetime of being bombarded so insidiously and relentlessly with the suggestion that gender is the single most defining trait a person possesses can do!

The Oscars and every other film awards ceremony split the actor category up by gender. But why? They don’t do it for Best Director or Best Screenplay. Perhaps that’s because those were all originally male-only fields. But as more and more (yet not nearly enough) women have broken into those roles over the decades (the first female cinematographer was nominated just this year), the Academy hasn’t felt the need to bifurcate any other award categories.

What is so important about gender to acting awards? All the best drama programs are co-ed. One could argue two-time Best Actress winner Jodie Foster is much more masculine than The Crying Game’s Jaye Davidson, who was nominated for Best Supporting Actor. So is it just a matter of anatomy? Surely not, for the first transgender nomination is right around the corner. And when that inevitably happens, the Pence brigade will take up arms against the LGBTQIA community over which category they belong in. Should it just be a matter of whether one identifies as male or female? More and more people are identifying as neither or in-between or fluid; so into which category — Best Actor or Best Actress — will the first nominated “they” go?

Imagine if the Oscars had acting categories based on sexual orientation or race or even hair color! If we don’t do it for these, why do it for gender? Some might argue that special categories for more marginalized groups can help with representation and recognition. Perhaps initially. But the best long-term fix to that problem is not segregation but rather opportunity and inclusion from the start. (See Frances McDormand’s mention — and later explanation — of “inclusion riders” at the 2018 Oscars.)

Open up the category to 9 or 10 nominees like Best Picture, or better yet, create two new categories: Best Drama Acting and Best Comedy/Musical/Adventure Acting, à la The Golden-Globes. After all, tragedy and comedy are two different, long-standing, legit categories of the craft; whether a performer wears a dress or a tux on the red carpet are not. (More and more women are donning suits these days anyway.) An initial 50/50 rule could be implemented, but ideally eventually rendered unnecessary once we get closer to true equality, with equal pay, a diversity of voices, and better representation behind the camera (and at the Academy and among movie reviewers and the list goes on).

Yes, the time has come to leave behind the limitations of this particular labeling. Multiple studies have shown the mere mention of gender can have negative consequences, especially for women, in a culture heavily invested in and so used to dividing things into pink and blue boxes (see again Parenting Beyond Pink and Blue for the meta data). Young people are rejecting gender stereotypes and embracing gender fluidity. And we’ve already abandoned the “genderfication” of many other job titles.

Waiters and waitresses are now servers; stewardesses are now flight attendants; mailmen are now mail carriers; firemen are now firefighters; comediennes are now simply comedians. Those little linguistic changes pack a lot of social punch. They convey that these fields are open to anyone; that one’s gender isn’t one’s most important or necessarily most defining characteristic — talent, work ethic, responsibleness, and success take priority.

So let’s drop the diminutive “ess” and let actors — no matter their gender identity, gender expression or anatomical bits — do their jobs and do them well.  Then, may the best human win.

A choose your own gender adventure:
WHICH OF THESE CATS IS FEMALE?

A Tale of Two Dates: 15 Lessons from the Aziz Ansari Case

To read the Tweets and comments on the Babe.net story about one woman’s horrible night with actor & comedian Aziz Ansari (read it here if you haven’t already), you’d assume there were only two possible, mutually exclusive conclusions to draw: either you believe that Ansari is a sexual assaulter who’s career should be over OR you’re convinced that the anonymous “Grace” is a weak woman who’s playing the victim card because their date didn’t go exactly how she had hoped.  There is no potential for grey area, no possibility for overlap. And is it any surprise in this hyper-partisan political climate?

One thing is abundantly clear: everyone needs to learn that an enthusiastic, verbal yes is a requirement for any and all good, consensual sexual encounters. This is non-negotiable. No complaints about lost eros, no rueing the death of sexual game-play. Stolen kisses (i.e. sexual sucker punches) are now and forever non-starters. Deal with it.

But as we grapple with this new reality of sexual justice and hammer out the necessary rules of good sexual communication in order to significantly reduce abuse and assault, can we approach complicated sexual questions with some nuance, sympathy and generosity, no matter which side we’re coming from? Can we hold two ideas in our head at once?

If we assume that everything in the Babe article happened as described, it’s not necessarily a case of EITHER/OR — it may just be a case of AND. It’s possible for Grace to have felt genuinely violated while at the same time Aziz genuinely (albeit mistakenly) thought she was into it. Yes, Ansari’s behavior was unquestionably selfish, entitled, presumptuous, and clueless — it should be harshly criticized and all of us (especially men) should learn from it.  But does this kind of bad behavior magically, surgically remove an adult woman’s sexual agency, her voice and her personal preferences? Should we be so quick to unequivocally call this “sexual assault” and Grace a “powerless victim”?  Doing so risks infantilizing women and ultimately undermining the effectiveness of the critically important #MeToo movement.

The brunt of the blame should no doubt fall on Ansari, who had the bulk of the power in the situation: he’s rich, famous, older and should know better, especially as someone who publicly calls himself a feminist. But both participants should be expected to take at least some responsibility for their own respective actions. Suggesting she do so does not absolve him — it simply aims to make everyone better sexual communicators. Because there are important lessons we can learn from his behavior and hers:

What We Can Learn From HIS Behavior

1. Do not try to relentlessly wear down your date’s defenses. The lasting legacy of the “Baby, It’s Cold Outside” dichotomy stinks. Good girls mustn’t admit their desires while manly men must chip-chip-chip away at those feminine false fronts?  Please. Those gender roles are stale, rotten, way past their sell by date. If you think a person is playing hard to get, assume they do NOT want to be gotten. Sex is not a game of peer pressure, cat-and-mouse, or psychological water torture. People who act unsure or uncomfortable are unsure and uncomfortable. For the sex to be good for everyone involved, participants need to be consistently confident and comfortable. Abort mission if this is clearly (or even just possibly) not the case.

2. Do not use alcohol to try to get the sexual outcome you desire out of a date. Proper consent cannot be given by people who are drunk — and it’s virtually impossible to tell when someone crosses the line from sober to sloshed.

3. Do not use the elements of surprise and speed to get what you want sexually. Stealing a kiss means you’re taking something not willfully given. And moving at hyper-speed before your partner has a chance to assess the situation or even protest is not only manipulative, it’s pathetic. If you have to rely on these kind of lame junior-high tricks to have sex then you’re not mature or responsible enough to have it in the first place.

4. When your partner says “Let’s slow down,” you need to let them be the initiator from then on. “Let’s chill for a sec” does not mean you take a two minute breather before you pick up exactly where you left off.

5. Do not take someone’s hand (or head) and put it on (push it toward) whatever you want touched. If they want to touch it, they will touch it of their own accord! The most you can do is ask nicely, no pressure.

6. Real life is not porn. You cannot act out a fantasy without negotiating the rules, the boundaries and the safeword first — especially not with someone you’ve just met, whose likes and dislikes and hard limits you can hardly guess. Two fingers in the mouth may be your RedTube turn-on, but they might also be your next partner’s deal-breaking “claw.” Take a genuine interest in your partner’s pleasure.

7. Be aware of your power and privilege. If you are a celebrity, a boss, or a person of great wealth/influence/experience/bodily strength, understand that your status as such may be incredibly intimidating to a romantic partner. Exerting anything that resembles sexual pressure — in other words, that is sexual pressure — can feel threatening, putting your partner in an uncomfortable position where they may feel like they can’t say no for fear of retribution or even violence. It’s your responsibility to set them at ease.

8. Be aware of your ego. If you are a celebrity, a boss, or a person of great wealth/influence/experience/bodily strength, that doesn’t automatically mean everyone wants to fuck you, even if they came back to your place for a drink. You may be used to being surrounded by “yes-people” and getting what you want, but that does not naturally extend to the bedroom.

9. If your partner stops actively engaging in the sexual encounter, you must stop. If they stop moving, stop kissing you, lie still, clench their fists, go limp, get that far-off disassociated look in their eyes, etc., you must disengage and check in with your partner to make sure they’re ok (even if you’re enjoying yourself, even if you’re “so close,” even if you’re afraid of blue balls!). And don’t try to convince yourself otherwise if their response is anything but authentic enthusiasm. In other words, don’t assume their mind just wandered off for a minute — assume they’re in distress!

10. If you are the sexual initiator, you must get an enthusiastic verbal yes all along the way. Ask for it. Continue to ask for it. Make it a part of the sexy talk. If you don’t get that enthusiastic yes, then for the god of love’s sake, don’t keep plugging along!

What We Can Learn From HER Behavior

1. Don’t rely on your non-verbal cues to do the talking. Use your voice. Be firm and assertive. Because when someone makes it clear they want to have sex with you (e.g. “I’m going to get a condom…” or “Where do you want me to fuck you?”), you have to make it clear, with words, if you don’t want to have sex with them (e.g. “I don’t want to have sex with you” or “Nowhere, because I don’t want to fuck”). If you do want to do sexual things with them, then give enthusiastic verbal yeses all along the way — don’t wait to be asked for them.

2. Be aware that sexually provocative questions may be a person’s way to ask for consent. They’re in the mood, they think you’re in the mood, and so as not to break the spell, they ask you — in seductive tones and with graphic language — what you would like to do: “How about you hop up and take a seat?” or “Where do you want me to fuck you?” Don’t interpret them as commands; assume they are sincere questions which should be answered sincerely. You might find such questions distasteful, embarrassing or difficult to answer, but if you’re not feeling it, break the spell.

3. When someone asks you to do something sexually that you do not want to do, do not cave to any pressure to do it. While you may have grown up learning to be agreeable, accommodating, pleasing, and/or low maintenance in order to be liked — especially common if you’re a woman — understand that asserting your sexual boundaries is not insulting, unfriendly, high maintenance or uptight. You are entitled to do as much or as little as you’d like with a willing partner. You owe them nothing — no matter how much money they’ve spent on you, how famous they are, how naked you currently are, or how much you’ve hooked up together previously. If a partner ends up not liking/dating/marrying you for establishing sexual boundaries, well then you’re better off without them (and they can go to hell).

4. Don’t acquiesce to a sexual request just to get it over with, appear cool, or relieve any pressure being put on you. Something like fellatio is not a throw-away move that doesn’t count. It is sex. Giving it with any reservations will only leave you feeling used and objectified.

5. While giving off mixed signals does not give anyone the right to abuse you, it can impede clear communication. When it comes to sex, people have different expectations, preferences, and assumptions. Again, one person’s go-to porn-move is another person’s “claw.”
While the sexual initiator should be clued in to their partner’s potential for discomfort, the pursued should try to see how their own behavior could be misinterpreted.  For example: allowing someone to undress you could certainly be read as a non-verbal cue that you are in fact interested in sexual contact; honoring a request for oral sex could understandably be read as an enthusiastic non-verbal affirmative.
As social animals, we tend to project our own thoughts and feelings onto others. We assume they feel exactly the same way we do. And we interpret their actions in a way that makes sense with our own experiences and values: “I asked for a blow job and she’s now giving it to me — that must mean she’s enjoying this, because I would only go down on someone because I really wanted to.”
With sex (as with any interpersonal relationship), the potential for miscommunication and misunderstanding is extremely high. Erring on the side of hyper-clarity, by both the pursuer and the pursued, can only help.

***

As the Aziz Ansari case painfully illustrates, sex can be an amorphous fog; trying to delineate it is a difficult but important endeavor. The first step is for men to learn to wield their sexual power responsibly. The next is for women to learn not to give theirs up.

Is Getting Consent Always Foolproof?
It’s Complicated