Merriam-Webster Accused of Pro-Gay Agenda

dictionaryphoto by greeblie

While the rest of us were battling it out over gay marriage in courts, newspaper editorials, elections, marches, and barrooms across the country, a little company called Merriam-Webster was quietly making their own call. So quietly, in fact, that even though their dictionary updated the definition of marriage back in 2003 to include same-sex couples, it wasn’t until this month that anybody really noticed. That’s because the conservative site WorldNetDaily finally caught on to the fact that in M-W, marriage is no longer “reserved for the institution that has held families together for millennia.” Oh, that’s right: Dictionaries describe things as they actually are — rather than the way the small-minded minority wishes they were. (All the major dictionaries now include same-sex duos in their definition, although only two three four U.S. states do.) All of which confirms to us that anti-gay crusaders don’t read the dictionary nearly as often as they should. Next stop: sodomy.

This post is a part of Sundance Channel’s Naked Love Blog
• Get the Naked Love RSS feed

Say Something

3 Comments on "Merriam-Webster Accused of Pro-Gay Agenda"

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted

Now we’re all wrong again! Hooray Vermont! Vermont is the first state to legalize same-sex marriage through the legislature, oerriding the veto of the governor:



Hi Em and Lo:

You are behind the times with regards to states that have embraced same-sex marriage: this morning, the Iowa Supreme Court overruled the ban on same-sex marriage in Iowa!