9/23/15
What “Intelligent Design” Has to Say About Strap-On Sex

We love a good burn — and a good burn that overturns gender-based stereotypes about sex is even better. Which is why we couldn’t resist featuring MVP commenter Johnny’s zinger this week, which was in response to an old-school nay-sayer in our (ever popular) conversation surrounding the post, “Confession: I Want to Do My Boyfriend with a Strap-On.” (541 comments and counting!)

Here’s the hilarious back-and-forth:

Reader Simone: load of crap. A woman is designed to be penetrated. End of story.

Reader Johnny: Woman wasn’t designed at all. She evolved.

Reader Simone: These days, designed is a more apt description of people. Regardless, if a woman were meant to penetrate, she would arrive in the world equipped with apparatus capable of developing to do so. What is a clit if not a half baked penis?

Reader Johnny: She does arrive in the world equipped with appendages capable of penetration – ten of them. Fingers. More if you count toes, but let’s not.

And that’s how it’s done, folks!

Want to join the Great American Strap-On Debate?
Chime in here!